From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67174: 30.0.50; [PATCH] What about a vectorized Gnus mode-line logo? Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <875xyz6jib.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87il64mo30.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87fs0tc6xr.fsf@gmail.com> <87il5na7tu.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87a5qx9p5h.fsf@gmail.com> <87h6ipkawg.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87sf23m4kw.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67174@debbugs.gnu.org To: Visuwesh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 16:53:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6i5-0008q7-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:53:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hl-0002DJ-Vg; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hk-0002DA-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hj-0006l4-Sl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hx-0004VL-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Manuel Giraud Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67174 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67174-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67174.170740756917296 (code B ref 67174); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67174) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2024 15:52:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hl-0004Us-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:42099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY6hi-0004Uj-Ex for 67174@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=Z9JwQUkT VIOGBRefjI5hoxYApgUg7x/aplb+pyJGrvY=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=nbjbSUs5SIZB84hMO+GgFNbQvpVtyH fSSUODXPWywP7rToL+MBChfuLkqZ4iQshBiKZVlVA0QZ/QcXcd89WBDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=Z9JwQUkTVIOGBRef jI5hoxYApgUg7x/aplb+pyJGrvY=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=zv11d/KmxSEjCbxHwOaHiKN9+gQ+uhsbP4ZJQJ MHGrnHhSmDyWWLkE4ntQarQy1XJB5QpsxM6PaxZOQsrrY4Wxt5MNtRe87HI2vNyP2JgGtU HSCjf1R6FEi3TU04F6+r1KF6lPqJtQ9avfz6NnQewtPQjbZU7ZKwIuf5i4Lf2PgUHtN9vN 3bSNjko0SY/b9eZsdYYx2AAGnNcIMRF3MpXr+YZIK+p5czvXOG4yeyOq0CbOPkyC2pD1bT KKFIzrQg5SJaLrLVEJuy5tt8d2CV3HXJUyXqBH/Lda94zdz0UTTpntqiwrL+Q2bwTjlx/3 u7vF2HAu/56/+Rlaj9WC5W3Q== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b47735ab (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:52:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87sf23m4kw.fsf@gmail.com> (Visuwesh's message of "Thu, 08 Feb 2024 19:38:15 +0530") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279643 Archived-At: Visuwesh writes: > [=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=A9=E0=AE=BF =E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE= =B0=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=B0=E0=AE=BF 03, 2024] Manuel Giraud wrote: > > Hello Manuel, > >> Visuwesh writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> That would be nice to have since I do like the little splash of >>> colour. >> >> Hi Visuwesh (and all), >> >> What do you think of this attached patch? Now that SVG are honoring the >> colors of the face property, I just add a face property to the logo. >> >> I have chosen 'font-lock-function-name-face' because it is a somewhat >> standard face and it is of color Blue1 (#0000ff) with the default Emacs >> theme (this is the same color of the XPM logo). >> >> Using a face property also have the nice property (=F0=9F=98=81) of auto= matically >> adapt to any other theme. > > I know that I asked about adding a splash of colour to the mode-line but > now that I have run the monochrome Gnus logo, I don't feel the need for > the splash of colour anymore. But if general consensus is that we add a > new face for this, can we add a new face that inherits from > font-lock-function-name-face instead? Hi Visuwesh, Yes, that would make much more sense indeed. But like you now, I'm used to the monochrome logo so if no one pushes for this change maybe it could be abandoned. --=20 Manuel Giraud