From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71655: Eshell external commands do not work under GNU Emacs for Windows Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 07:56:16 +0200 Message-ID: <875xtyyjcv.fsf@gmx.de> References: <86y170oifx.fsf@gnu.org> <86v824ohym.fsf@gnu.org> <86r0csnrk7.fsf@gnu.org> <8b97b729-c431-1dc2-d4d4-b988120e7de0@gmail.com> <86cyocnjkl.fsf@gnu.org> <858d2907-7ee4-da6f-cd9e-6b7bd3ba4c7e@gmail.com> <86pls8ff73.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Michael Albinus Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34544"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 71655@debbugs.gnu.org, james@literate-devops.io To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 07:57:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sLchY-0008sO-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 07:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLchL-0006UP-Vz; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLchJ-0006DU-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLchJ-0000BF-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLchK-0006mj-0m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 05:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71655.171920859126028 (code B ref 71655); Mon, 24 Jun 2024 05:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2024 05:56:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLcgo-0006lk-TF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:37139) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLcgl-0006lR-UT for 71655@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:56:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1719208577; x=1719813377; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=MsPiM0c75KRGEvDdV/2llRn3prHoH/YH5Wegpq4cEUg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=b+WmZZSmMERteOMPV+PJXpAd2LkO8Lud35UrmUFhsG0fc19GI9AmmfS2u0l/sxct WqgkdXHZWvMzfyJfJVMvpwWyiDXJJHHd+LkdCCKkBSDGYDIsRolPQW2cW7F7Ip1c/ oD5BFG5Q7zfKU3Hy0Yz21QgzQ2Rxi3GzkA7lqcXFqPxsW6W2ykajD5ChY1J2KnNHn 0fxbb0ae6rt3SHGDtdkhnZBIQgQHL95K4fM2TvgwFzaSs2t+WJjAX7Md1yr8fmijz ng0tTZwVYu8Cl7zbZcm46p80KGpDEWTvSYDx4I8cp8+ffwwI+00FoUHanMUQzB6t+ c9zjx6tB9Y3PK9iDkw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.38.155]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mi2Nv-1sqIk42xRh-00fbPY; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 07:56:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jim Porter's message of "Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:40:37 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:feM0G5w/iMvYrYLVzwrT9nWcSa2BxuKm06W10mZwbW1yxi74rOU HoypByskbTOaatxLKgQpIZ6g4lSL3CFquuHzaZLsEUCGElfqjSfbtoeLkXLU+gUtsoi9MLl 50kReIh+EyOMQsWce3lYWVRGILumCTSh9IET2s8ECebm3h65cpeOT20Fij32hL0FySgpiIY H+eXkbh8fLkHd11GxW3vQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:9jDgGiZjCw8=;79EmVovjmGXWlxrWmo4eIYL+KdJ KxUIeaDETEe+xM1/MmaUqRs4l/WweMEVYwPkeqTs29rtIy2wWul6OVw3EQXFlPlYVqE2endQY PcUY/ZHcqT8A2xePpc3uEQelS5cJcuH5FRZ5f6RDOeDWhVGcFeovl26h1NYRtSngbl8iN98ep UeWHoMHSJBAC6ryKDYd/NnqP9UHj0jan/AY6rm9tD8QUX1LWZ9pj8cCIz3fOOUqniRcix/v2c NkNoBsqDJXtCpZH2QkOORCian8zje7jUQ9UbEFaNAhs7dZv2ILsEIVoJie6jB/g2y3sJjRi8Y Ij2p5hmUkxTJE1bhbpkyuI85mGP6QByAm7VD0T8qqROhEm2VuiJWhZdK3v+4FhfKNHxN6uJuL VkG540u8AdUFkfmvZthvLLPseJ8oruuu1QvK/Vvzm8kOKJH+ABqAuQaiadDAc7TzpAGJcRYCG LMMWD64pAet3KmlHU+BUdGXJOT27HGEwRr91WmHFkkxXAN+F25YM4vYzlCR9r0DBTJ6LNLEF4 TmUdMweil5QayDLj6i/1sQcM65irdcbpHEdMKldrXOYI5Ysc0he+29RqySGQvZpwyAVzw9tKh JlkErnEDZ623JV5++qeAkfmRPNnah0eKkBBO16T7SMGtz3rtLYHKJoS6E+xN7Gu36Ixag1pBQ AqYXtZC8bfMVgKcvvOSMUzpshSWVubJgt8VqyUsvVjI3mPpP9MWBaxTFe6pJDDtzDQ0Xvd7p9 0Ihu3VRmydn7vypwLi9mYzpwE7JfLlW/3XIYoC3jzg2VEn3/Pn1lSTJslIcxQSa7oLRdx50y X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287821 Archived-At: Jim Porter writes: Hi Jim, > That could work, though thinking about this some more, I think there's > a benefit to being careful about how we add checks here. For Tramp > files, we should probably try to keep the number of calls that need to > touch the remote filesystem to a minimum. > > I'll think about this some more and see if we can get all the checks > we want without making the code slower over Tramp. (Maybe Tramp caches > enough that this isn't a problem, but I'm not certain yet.) If Eshell calls `process-file', it shall bind `process-file-side-effects' to nil if appropriate for the given command. Furthermore, Eshell might bind `remote-file-name-inhibit-cache' to something which helps. The default value (10) seems to be very conservative. In case Eshell needs to clear the cache for a given directory, there is `dired-uncache'. Contrary to its name, it is not restricted to dired, but of general purpose. Best regards, Michael.