From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Schroeder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Emacs Website. Was: 21.2 release. Was: dabbrev can hang in presence of fields Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:18:08 +0100 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <874rj8spv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pu1zcx8y.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87d6xwkj9e.fsf@gnu.org> <5567-Fri22Mar2002135300+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016803097 11507 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 13:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oOvx-0002zT-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:18:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oOvw-00089k-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:18:16 -0500 Original-Received: from news.swissonline.ch ([62.2.16.82]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oOtQ-00085Z-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by news.swissonline.ch (8.11.1/8.11.1) id g2MDFch25834; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:15:39 +0100 (MET) Original-To: gnu-emacs-bug@gnu.org Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug X-Face: ^BC$`[IcggstLPyen&dqF+b2'zyK#r.mU*'Nms}@&4zw%SJ#5!/7SMVjBS7'lb;QK)|IPU5U'o1'522W4TyzB3Ab*IBo^iw]l4|kUbdZuUDO6=Um-.4IzhNiV'B"@K#jy_(wW|Zbk[34flKY^|PrQ?$u2\fKg^]AY>wOX#H32i Original-Lines: 40 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:q8gJ7quuBL6uT6b31sXr5vHIVGI= Original-Path: Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.162.233.81 Original-X-Trace: news.swissonline.ch 1016802938 217.162.233.81 (22 Mar 2002 14:15:38 +0100) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@swissonline.ch X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by news.swissonline.ch id g2MDFch25834 Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:62 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: >> I would, if I thought it would stand a chance. I just assume that >> either the GNU people running the server don't want to install weird >> software (such as the wiki script), or people are affraid of abuse. >> But other than that, yes, I think it is a good solution. > > Well, in that case, I disagree. With the arguments mentioned, or because of something else? Or with the assumption I made? >> It works fine on the wiki. It has now 731 pages, and managed to get >> lots of hits: > > The number of hits is not the only criterion of the quality. Nor is > it certain that the goals of the Emacs page and the wiki are > comparable. Correct, haha, but that was trivial. What I WANTED to say is that even though the pages are publically editable, there is not much abuse. I get lots of hits, have lots of pages, and only one incident that I remember. > Anyway, this is all IMHO; I'm not the head maintainer for Emacs, so > there are others you could try to convince. Heh, "Steter Tropfen h=F6hlt den Stein" (constant water drops will hollow the stone?). > I'll happily relinquish my duties of taking care of the Emacs Web > page as far as my time allows. I only took it upon myself because > no one else volunteered, and because the grave problems could be > fixed by a small amount of work, an amount I could afford. Thanks for the time you are investing. Alex. --=20 http://www.emacswiki.org/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs