From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3370: 23.0.94; `comment-region' indents comment chars inappropriately Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:47:32 -0400 Message-ID: <874ov9aivv.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87prdynkm5.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87tz3admt1.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <4A19F427.40606@gnu.org> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 3370@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243228174 1079 80.91.229.12 (25 May 2009 05:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 05:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , rms@gnu.org, 3370@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 25 07:09:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M8SRA-0001N7-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 07:09:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38296 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8SRA-0003wk-8d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8SR5-0003wO-4j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8SR0-0003vn-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35465 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8SR0-0003vk-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:54733) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8SQz-0004Un-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4P59BT7016962; Sun, 24 May 2009 22:09:11 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4P4t73a013927; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:55:07 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 04:55:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3370 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3370-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B3370.124322683512810 (code B ref 3370); Mon, 25 May 2009 04:55:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3370) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 25 May 2009 04:47:15 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4P4lBmv012804 for <3370@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:47:12 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA47E57E263; Mon, 25 May 2009 00:47:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4A19F427.40606@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Mon, 25 May 2009 09:28:07 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:09:18 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:28132 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > Or perhaps it would have been better putting it back to plain if > Richard's new indent-or-triple option was found to not be a suitable > default. I'm not sure that Dan looked into the history when he > changed it to indent. Maybe. Could Dan or Richard weigh in on this? Personally, all else being equal, I think `indent' is a better comment style. For instance, all the Emacs sources use that style.