From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10195: 24.0.92; M-w may no longer provide visual feedback Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:31 -0500 Message-ID: <874nxhy91k.fsf@maru.md5i.com> References: <20111202110953.0484349381.qww314159@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com> <83aa7bc597.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3c6xltz.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <8362hyces6.fsf@gnu.org> <878vmty979.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322925771 544 80.91.229.12 (3 Dec 2011 15:22:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10195@debbugs.gnu.org, ejb@ql.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 16:22:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQL-0006NO-Gb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:22:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50706 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQL-0002IS-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQI-0002IN-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQH-000821-6q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQH-00081x-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQb-0003SV-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10195 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10195-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10195.132292577413283 (code B ref 10195); Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2011 15:22:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQU-0003SB-9v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from md5i.com ([75.151.244.229] helo=maru.md5i.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQS-0003S5-RH for 10195@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:53 -0500 Original-Received: from md5i by maru.md5i.com with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RWrQ7-0003tQ-Cr; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:22:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878vmty979.fsf@maru.md5i.com> (Michael Welsh Duggan's message of "Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:19:06 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:23:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54647 Archived-At: Michael Welsh Duggan writes: > I just tried this again in a random buffer in my running non -Q emacs. > The first M-w caused the cursor to bounce, the second did not, the third > did, the fourth and fifth did not. This is why I called the behavior > inconsistent. I just tried it in emacs -Q again, and had it bounce > three times out of 15 tries. When it does bounce, and the mark and > point are on different lines, I also see the line indicator change along > with the bounce. When it does not bounce, the line indicator does not > change. I should mention that when I say I tries this N times, I mean without moving the mark or point. -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i@md5i.com)