From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10224: 24.0.92; M-w inhibits echoing of prefix arguments Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:17:53 +0800 Message-ID: <874nxet8pa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa767oig.fsf@escher.fritz.box> <87wraav51r.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkf6dump.fsf@escher.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323159524 31282 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2011 08:18:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10224@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 09:18:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEX-00039Q-Ti for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:18:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEX-0006xr-EG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEP-0006xf-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEL-0001O8-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEL-0001O2-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEw-0003c0-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10224 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10224-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10224.132315952013848 (code B ref 10224); Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10224) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2011 08:18:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEZ-0003bJ-SE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqEY-0003bD-5x for 10224@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [155.69.19.114] (port=34181 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXqDw-0007Ik-Aq; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:18:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zkf6dump.fsf@escher.fritz.box> (Stephen Berman's message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:30:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:19:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54739 Archived-At: Stephen Berman writes: > Sorry for the confusion. Step 2 was only meant to demonstrate the usual > echoing of prefix arguments; it's not a necessary step to get the bug. > Step 3 is really the entire recipe: after setting the mark (in any way) > and then typing M-w, all subsequent interactively typed prefix arguments > are no longer echoed. (Under conditions I haven't yet been able to > determine, the echoing sometimes returns after a while, but immediately > vanishes again upon typing M-w (if the mark is set).) I can't reproduce any unexpected behavior. Are you sure you're not just seeing the usual effect of echo-keystrokes (which specifies a 1 second pause before echoing)?