From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9361: 24.0.50; default value of `dired-do-chmod' Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:09:30 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <874nvh2uet.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <03BC028E352D4173B985B3B34DF3193A@us.oracle.com> <87zkiyabea.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <1BDADB23B4434E0C9330F1B010F1E1CE@us.oracle.com> <88378BBDA1F142B6A8CFF3961B3DEDDF@us.oracle.com> <87obtpd2uv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327668122 11977 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2012 12:42:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9361@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 13:41:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql7q-0005Hw-Ml for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:41:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4X-0000EI-H6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4V-0000E2-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4U-0005Nz-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4U-0005No-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql54-0000hg-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9361 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 9361-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9361.13276679372694 (code B ref 9361); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 12:38:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4y-0000hO-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:56 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:33068 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rql4v-0000hF-G8 for 9361@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:38:55 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC46451C7FC; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:37:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87obtpd2uv.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:24:56 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56081 Archived-At: >> This bug has not at all been fixed - AFAICT, everything I reported is >> still a problem. It should not have been closed. > > Your suggestion in the original post was > >>> The best approach is not to provide any default value here. > > As Juri noted, if you don't want the suggested value, just don't type > M-n. Since this command no longer accepts empty input as a permission, > there is nothing else to fix. IIUC, the most recent Drew's suggestion was something different, i.e. what to use as a default value when more than one file is marked. Since this is a separate wish, then perhaps the best thing for Drew to do is to create a new wishlist report.