From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18051: 24.3.92; ls-lisp: Sorting; make ls-lisp-string-lessp a normal function? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:37:19 +0200 Message-ID: <874myfatyo.fsf@web.de> References: <87ha2f5gp8.fsf@web.de> <838unr6ttu.fsf@gnu.org> <871ttj5dfi.fsf@web.de> <837g3b6ob7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405676312 26651 80.91.229.3 (18 Jul 2014 09:38:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18051@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 18 11:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X84cM-00053f-6I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:38:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X84cL-0007Gh-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:38:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X84cD-0007Ei-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X84c6-0006W7-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X84c6-0006W3-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X84c6-0006rx-B6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18051 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18051-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18051.140567626126368 (code B ref 18051); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2014 09:37:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X84bh-0006rB-61 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:54372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X84bb-0006qr-3o for 18051@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 05:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.127.201]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lwq4m-1WS2jw3Biy-016RHK; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:37:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <837g3b6ob7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:53:00 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Jmhv1rV+IDA3U09Z/QVOgAy4j4tc2BnL26+QV5yx84nuQ5WnTqp XQ+AiYTuuxLqMOT4mMmBBsW04usAJKSyFKp7zUX8/ytorNx3vJY+vLveXkl3erkw1Aft3gT fUZbXlq/m2TecNWNRxMBxplc7AqQSIa5OfbSdgHQuAYhMSrj42rfWvBFzLnmtLSIOo1eshW kl0SYJUFBTKSxqUf4tFYQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91629 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > could I please get my `ls-lisp-string-lessp' defined as a function? > > You can always redefine the functions that call it, no? That would cover the whole switch processing algorithm, `ls-lisp-handle-switches', 60 lines of code. I would shadow any future change in that code by redefining that huge function. That's why I wanted to avoid that. What's the advantage of `ls-lisp-string-lessp' being a defsubst? If it really makes it significantly faster (it's called a lot of times, of course), then ok, let's keep it. Thanks, Michael.