From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17636: Implement SCRAM-SHA-1 SASL mechanism Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:57:27 +1100 Message-ID: <874mqqnq88.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423817969 9228 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2015 08:59:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Magnus Henoch , 17636@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 13 09:59:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5l-0003y6-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:59:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5f-0007u9-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5b-0007s2-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5W-0005vA-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5W-0005v0-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC5W-00071O-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17636 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 17636-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17636.142381791726959 (code B ref 17636); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17636) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2015 08:58:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC56-00070k-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]:4627) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMC54-00070c-Lz for 17636@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t1D8vWgm079275; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:57:32 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:41:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.119, required 4, AWL 0.02, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99289 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Would it be okay for a module in lisp/net to depend on a module in >> lisp/gnus? > > I think it would be better to move rfc2104 elsewhere (probably into > lisp/net). I've now moved it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/