From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20193: 25.0.50; declarative type specification for D-Bus args Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:40:11 +0100 Message-ID: <874mp628is.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87bnjgat6z.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427442095 1467 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2015 07:41:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20193@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daiki Ueno Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 27 08:41:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOtB-0005eR-0l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:41:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48469 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOtA-0000Vh-7L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOt7-0000Td-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOt4-0004D5-H4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOt4-0004D1-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOt4-00048z-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20193.142744202515845 (code B ref 20193); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2015 07:40:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOsS-00047U-AS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62989) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YbOsO-00047D-20 for 20193@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.35.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lwnem-1ZZ2uK4984-016Ood; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:40:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Daiki Ueno's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:29:22 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zFrXCDLDxABiKX+MXl20bFhSa++ZHiAFWJ3XslJmkYLm+GYTvh6 /4i2Xivqi5zwIi/WgwmllRbQswO3ZN01U4iqzcnL/D13S5hq8Q8WnS8n1pE5aAnmEVfiMFv 4+GSwdSJV3ITXYs11vd9X9ajfbZm99auu/AjKwRjge3+lCk8goq8wUS9PWo1TttaDjk14UE OZvGpqU3NEFRCR81o91vA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100969 Archived-At: Daiki Ueno writes: > Certainly. Do you have any preference on the alternative form? My > example used the `:type' keyword, but it was a tentative plan and might > be too verbose for programmers. Reusing `:signature' might be a better > idea as you mentioned (though it might be confusing with the current > meaning of `:signature' as a D-Bus type "g"). I'm OK with :type, as you said it is similar to what defcustom offers. :signature would be confusing indeed, when it means Lisp objects instead of a signature string. > Regards, > -- > Daiki Ueno Best regards, Michael.