From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: oscarfv@telefonica.net (=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22832: 25.0.91; Keyboard navigation broken on menus Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:03:56 +0100 Message-ID: <874mct7wer.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87d1ri6j5g.fsf@telefonica.net> <83fuweaq5q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456603521 22854 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2016 20:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22832@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 21:05:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl71-0005GV-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:05:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl70-0006Zh-D0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl6x-0006Yn-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl6s-0000eX-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:05:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl6s-0000eS-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl6s-0006qM-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: oscarfv@telefonica.net (=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22832 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22832-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22832.145660344726237 (code B ref 22832); Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22832) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2016 20:04:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49125 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl5y-0006p6-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp20.acens.net ([86.109.99.144]:61500 helo=smtp.movistar.es) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZl5v-0006o6-S0 for 22832@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:04:05 -0500 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0206.56D2012D.0058, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (79.153.146.151) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 56B309D801E51616; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:03:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83fuweaq5q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:50:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113978 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Can you see if 8784ebf is the culprit? No, it isn't. The previous revision also shows the problem. Give an hour and I'll bisect the problem.