From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22582: 25.0.90; package-test fail on w64 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:55 -0500 Message-ID: <874lzif8yo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <837figs8jp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pow8qm6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83bn7rqfv0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488045500 15550 195.159.176.226 (25 Feb 2017 17:58:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:58:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Fabrice Popineau , 22582@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 18:58:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbh-00032J-TZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 18:58:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43768 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbo-0003Ac-1a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbg-00039G-4M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbb-0006rm-7x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbb-0006rh-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chgba-0004Ww-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22582 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22582-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22582.148804547017394 (code B ref 22582); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22582) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2017 17:57:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbO-0004WP-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:36432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chgbM-0004W7-MN; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id w10so1898021iod.3; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:57:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=aLC1+XW0Tnef/+mIFOKXYrrsPgRw1GTD2EtibnQjN60=; b=jbWOYVEHooABf6TRsQ0eQVhyuLoTRm2bHWtJoBQRj7na8oED1XHPjirDAxZRomN/bl uYRdkUQvtMNmyDKaGftb/JB2URC+X44Zax8t54GtlHUumrn7U725qm8T0sN9RMKgCV1n yqOo+HcmgTVWzyYR6aIXk98P2QSq6wV3TOzY2sdQWYNxVOrO2TGlH+A8oJ9o1fh8GRa7 6aRDAOJpdKbTvzo4NglAkzGLgsmfMTsxCAhTRWjY5lh5lsypLEQXelrLuZ4wudDeFt6u 6LgaKJLMT1R8fPdNwOI2qmFUGTr4NLip8ED0keputZn1+iJ1F74UXsnzRfX6TbESJVOn ZYpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=aLC1+XW0Tnef/+mIFOKXYrrsPgRw1GTD2EtibnQjN60=; b=m8kbGg4YDi5N75YiHbaq9U2hrD4Zqvl0tx9ZNPyTQ0PmD9ElNGUbwr8r2JGCQ0hdEl bDbAOInKm7YRnn8TpR2AyEGRnUmsQDiY7YJkjHNeDDYDNYLIA65p2TAXl+y/uE1plJqX YCKIq6qNrK5MV+BtNccLea4rQ2frFT23Sah0VDZeOxkyw2Haz479ARvuG84Kwn/Qmm5f RIE3YRhCi9RzfSYXNQk28xQat9ank8AeiIxuUUx0IPKOC36n0cMIEVOcDlypBoxqyb86 vRGWEAt3BJhdrf2rnMsvbJIZ2n8kx8hm51wmKzT8Pcz97s4KEE2kNWAdu5fiSW/d85z2 sUBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lMKezEZYRe97HV1R6hDmB4gWQ7ah/fWiUSTtpg2Dsdqe38/utOAjb0Mql9VJiH4w== X-Received: by 10.107.31.204 with SMTP id f195mr9338582iof.183.1488045463016; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:57:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j14sm2310655itd.0.2017.02.25.09.57.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:57:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83bn7rqfv0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:19:47 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129794 Archived-At: tags 22582 fixed close 22582 26.1 quit Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Fabrice Popineau >> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:04:49 +0100 >> Cc: 22582@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> If I run the package-test-server.py and I try to connect from a browser with >> http://0.0.0.0:8000/archive-contents, I get ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. >> >> But that I have the same error if I try to open: >> http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8000/archive-contents with xx.xx.xx.xx being my current IP address. >> >> I get the file only if I connect to http://127.0.0.1:8000/archive-contents. >> >> So I suspect that it is a default setting of the firewall in Windows 10. >> >> The python server script >> test/automated/data/package/package-test-server.py >> runs explicitly on 127.0.0.1, so why not using this address in the test? >> What does using 0.0.0.0 brings here in the package-test-update-archives-async test? > > I don't know. Perhaps someone else does. > > Failing that, maybe we should just make the change and see who > hollers. Done [1: 546d30ed14]. 1: 2017-02-25 12:56:09 -0500 546d30ed1400d5a434886790a102bd37ec852919 Don't use IP 0.0.0.0 for package test server (Bug#22582)