From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33782: 27.0.50; Emacsclient ignores errors when its frame is deleted Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:05:36 -0400 Message-ID: <874l3u3aq7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ftnepyvp.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="212517"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philipp , 33782@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 10 04:07:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hl20d-000t6g-1j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:07:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57538 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl20b-0001qb-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1zo-0001pd-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1zk-0008Jl-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1ze-0008FM-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1zd-0006V5-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33782 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 33782-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33782.156272434624967 (code B ref 33782); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33782) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 02:05:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1zO-0006UX-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:05:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com ([209.85.166.42]:43340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl1zM-0006UF-Ns; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:05:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k20so1238410ios.10; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:05:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5gvYZhqNpEHh7cGh9n3UQmkQGzn867hDXFLpiSvwmDY=; b=Ysti2R1hqhmYMkufXva+YzfBtcbK5z++tFXBHNt5JnO0S92qMIUelMq4yXwuWrbPqu hWOBX3fw7bdjHhjHh9YQSNWIUXWNPDNsI5+w7arBHmU3uaYKDUvEnUl61EE5qa/cIcZ2 +54gQpQ3Z0UFe2Kos4KSOVwO1ssgwJJ3Pt0DeJv5DXu1eLcqZ8EXBAUwmtraRbYP+KKs ct5jPwkxg5X4pD4jkrEQ9cKW4+CtLbTFXAszuXb5mUwcgjInj97Po9odXcZn5ZSeQOpK EznmLyUF5ANQLExaHYO1yiAeLgKNrpQk3nkDNHqr6eBzmIBDzJxyNyUs1yPj6dWdyPsK brWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5gvYZhqNpEHh7cGh9n3UQmkQGzn867hDXFLpiSvwmDY=; b=tFqjIl7Ny04OmsVrIshhFXmNNfXLRZq/DHkCXbxobh4FEHDBsAKWuG3+dc7Lgzmjqy OUXwI3TxMEoNgM2EjofWhMbsmwB574j82RVv7tL2G/FwFvfvWWLfAji82isICJxyJF/u HJPAeu33PthMDZF6F9mkWhzwIKdwuUx9QzBLPDIA4ZUJF692quX2RvkJi8++1lbJTVP4 MZXOT+Ba0XpUudzIFHhyXtr1PFpbH21JQ+0+u/n8guT4sFLpRbgiQXmhyjbpzwfmIx1v 9YcLqwXoQ6OTmWiyRp11IDYU8ZJysuqHQdZfyQZR06EaKugXE28eSm/MUgQTeaAnYgl2 YNIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV0YBIAVOcdD6kkPlnGI+OQUfL+Il4tsoaka3fUVtUrlOLpCjGM eOhTc9volxSK0CqekhRd+AwIZH2a X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxX/BpSZvTvnag/VR5cpHxpG5/uk5GxX5yDRVIAXbjyyfvGHjAYxWhzYbmaWLB0eSqCR74WJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8c97:: with SMTP id g23mr28825111ion.250.1562724338916; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n26sm399176ioc.74.2019.07.09.19.05.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:05:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ftnepyvp.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:32:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162587 Archived-At: reopen 33782 tags 33782 - notabug quit Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philipp writes: > >> Assuming an Emacs server is running: >> >> $ emacsclient --create-frame --eval '(unwind-protect (error "foo") (delete-frame))' ; echo $? >> 0 >> >> This means that if the frame created by Emacsclient is deleted, errors >> are ignored. This seems like a bug; I wouldn't expect errors to be >> ignored in this case, because they should bubble up through the >> `unwind-protect' form. > > Well... like > > (unwind-protect (error "foo") (message "zot")) > > there's no error bubbling, and there's no error to be returned, so I > think this is correct behaviour? No, that's incorrect, unwind-protect doesn't catch errors, it just executes the handler forms (in this case (message "zot")) before the error finishes bubbling.