From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36903: 27.0.50; gnus registry vs. debbugs Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <874l1e7wcq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87pnlmen9q.fsf@web.de> <87zhkqw965.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhkpq0az.fsf@web.de> <87ef21wzrm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r261pwi6.fsf@web.de> <87tvaxvfxc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pnllvera.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfw497re.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87blx0afpv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r25rz36l.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87o90u2yq9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="219206"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36903@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 14 17:05:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bs-000usE-6j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:05:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bq-0005ay-MW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bj-0005YI-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bi-0006Qv-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bi-0006Qk-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i99bh-0005Z2-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36903 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36903-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36903.156847346721341 (code B ref 36903); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36903) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2019 15:04:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i99b9-0005Y9-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:36768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i99b7-0005Y1-89 for 36903@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i99b4-0001H2-6s; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:04:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o90u2yq9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:24:30 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166459 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> I can't really imagine it being performance-related... computing the >> specs take extremely little time. >> >> But it's possible, I guess. > > I'll patch locally and run it for a while. So I think we arrived at the conclusion that removing that removal should be safe (i.e., a noop) -- did you apply the patch? I'm not sure how this related to the other registry stuff... What was the conclusion there? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no