From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25308: Shorten long "ui-lines" in Custom buffers Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 15:34:52 +0100 Message-ID: <874kzlc9kj.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87eg0o2psh.fsf@bernoul.li> <83o9zsgq0n.fsf@gnu.org> <87h83ldrxa.fsf@marxist.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="142421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , 25308@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 03 15:35:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGyF-000av7-CM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 15:35:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGyE-0002iy-4i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy7-0002ir-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy6-000278-EY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy6-000274-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy6-0006ny-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25308 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25308-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25308.157279169926147 (code B ref 25308); Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2019 14:34:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy3-0006nf-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:34:59 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGy1-0006nW-13 for 25308@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iRGxx-0006We-8i; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 15:34:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h83ldrxa.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:13:05 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170872 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Yes, it works on both text based and graphical displays. Please see > the attached patch. > > Lars suggested to remove the lines entirely, but I think I prefer to > not change that for now. Perhaps it would make more sense as part of > a bigger overhaul of the look and feel of customize. > > Any comments? I haven't tried the patch, but it looks good to me. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no