From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40863: [PATCH] Improve the display-time-world UI Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:04:10 -0400 Message-ID: <874kt4o7it.fsf@gmail.com> References: <831roa731a.fsf@gnu.org> <85y2qg976f.fsf@gmail.com> <83ees84w6g.fsf@gnu.org> <85tv1492ju.fsf@gmail.com> <834kt44t7l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="57622"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 40863@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 01:05:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoL-000Ete-Do for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoK-0006lZ-52 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoB-0006lQ-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoA-00033g-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoA-00033a-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCoA-0005rx-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40863 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 40863-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40863.158802866322505 (code B ref 40863); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40863) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2020 23:04:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCnX-0005qv-5f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:04:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com ([209.85.222.169]:33389) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTCnV-0005qj-S6 for 40863@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 23so15115131qkf.0 for <40863@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:04:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5p4R3pMQd+juh8etMEx1xW9drgvKFIZyfEJeshqP7bo=; b=B4ZLKROapec5SMMbnWb8XPeoH7Ihor8dyUHm9ZZQyBsl21mGedrw+rYt6nAtmnkz7V A0MtppuLvmqBMztHh2nuB2/0WwjpH1jxszvODs8i9GvodNj3T9ZYOyEhjXimpPD5Qynj P6/LemMG4CYXGdEBgFMOyfQ9A6i3+ckRVV/Ix2javJotmhTr7Od8vevg3oLOriPlaSKJ HFPv/J1jp2QQWL/vbZVhsvUlGEtx8GiLiuLR8q/HnxqlfZqUR7ZA/0g9u9bL5RiKLdwf 9yyGAfHOw1OHtXAZtWT0+ENsVhKCo3t9kOv9SuudWnd3SCOls9x45UsydQp81Dyl6xPu r0Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5p4R3pMQd+juh8etMEx1xW9drgvKFIZyfEJeshqP7bo=; b=HJ38f9/Jc4JQW9D9VCbuOjeYf548iJR5ZYpZLCIIngNvOPc3aSj4yk+sMMEA99JSXq 0zWD2n8z1FeuTYXRgvRQqfE63MPG4x+5Uk5PQqaI7PF0DEJysxusc+M2Yd7aJ7nTxw3j 4d9N07V30PVyYW0VfJX8edLDxBlQjlzLXKxVOoLYvR4idsD7xb/H09eEfiKZFD9JiN3O yKys9Lkd/42ndyLiYhy3xEPmmOFyZMTQDVSIQcpIo5HH88eGIA6qGpMe3/oiVjhscb9I 4u+kfWvzCMUOMYXKaInTHS5/QK5TeJSJ2l53LMqc/nmtWUlNcxnJDtwFuCXHiyX75RV8 W/yA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ5tV3WBOw1kp2cIH/LZHP3lpAirvSKPiGTOObharTAh4cSGRn4 Vfajtisu80+PY48ZpKzIG66D41eb X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIRbQyRJA7roh2UZFKWq6RHzUl6yUwhM2mw6nevEOYdUJGgp3Paooz3jjlQHf5LUsDiX0BSvA== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e217:: with SMTP id c23mr24385292qkc.398.1588028656407; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-47.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u190sm12139704qkb.102.2020.04.27.16.04.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:04:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:00:32 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179189 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 27.04.2020 22:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I guess it's a matter of personal preferences, then. E.g., we have >> *scratch* and*xref*. > > Scratch is scratch. No longer name needed (I wouldn't know what to use). I guess "*Scratch*" vs "*scratch*", but I don't think that's a significant enough difference to even look at. > Regarding xref, someday we'll use longer names. E.g. ones including > the search input. Since the term "xref" is used all over in package name, command names, documentation, etc; users already need to be familiar with the short form. That's not the case for "wclock". Anyway, none of this is especially important. Leaving the name as it is won't do any harm.