From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41890: 28.0.50; [PATCH]: Add bindings for project.el Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 09:24:50 -0700 Message-ID: <874kqcsnu5.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> References: <87mu50b43d.fsf@warpmail.net> <87pn92t1ye.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24478"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41890@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Dmitry Gutov , "Philip K." , "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 12 18:25:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1juemt-0006Gu-0X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:25:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51942 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juemr-00058S-VQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juemk-00058F-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juemk-00089X-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1juemk-0003Lt-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41890 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41890-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41890.159457110012875 (code B ref 41890); Sun, 12 Jul 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41890) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2020 16:25:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1juemi-0003La-Hy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:44151) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1juemf-0003LI-6z for 41890@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:24:59 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F835C00F2; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:24:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:24:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=HODl5sgaZnZlo2iwenJ8CxJ5ES 9B8Q3cf+dWADXOIQI=; b=G5M5hYUu+hmQOQkhIDjXtmlbypOZw1BszLDuEMdj6Y 10YZNDv/ZsYKlL17mmexiCFrnRc3LQdLhFcjbKpXPFk+NRAFg64983htq3HsZDxd w1h1nTGxKqtl9K4Kax0ozI7q7pOHCZISHOMfGA8NWI5LOauuxfpWxAtiEwrbAuMr teDGLBAMz5nfOIC4cm5gtbJAOOdVTOZtNU6R4qDorNSumojjI8MBfEHiuWN47kM/ rqb2nh01hkLYp/E0pwOYg1dx/iCiA6TA/JlrfIkF1v73Bshf2NwEys7A64rQ47xE 2coVNCrSVmW8BeymrgBXkfQTu6vN44DmKezZS5piSTSQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HODl5s gaZnZlo2iwenJ8CxJ5ES9B8Q3cf+dWADXOIQI=; b=CUWCA1B6udneu82ZG4tvet 2L6Pi0/9ZUy3W28rPpmugejJGi1ghFxzn+4HxlRLTfbnktgGG0t7q+68XOApYQ2m k1z9tkI8JXn13N9gaKbUI9q6AjC4OyWRGNmQz4RKErETUZRgAqqa3hKYogqQVA96 D251kLMCY4zaL0j1EUkLkpKjgjlZyBWwF8HddeBfFB6pgRWWeJPfknDqc8T3hfbw hwsA6h3swqJ+Ec/Y95ddIsUBpXMirPtv6WA4tSnTvgnNgwD5mHN31oSxF8zslob1 c1oHiTH5dtvk5kg9ERO3sdUznpZyqJjrN6dI8VGFbcn6+gZonl7XPdH3Ji/1OYCw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrvdeigddutdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucgh hhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddvheegfffhffdvfeefhffgjefflefhteevffffkeetgfdt jedtiedvtdevheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182949 Archived-At: Hello Dmitry, Thank you for your reply. On Sun 12 Jul 2020 at 06:18PM +03, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > You can post the patch you are working on, even if it depends on this one. > > But why project--keymap-prompt, though? I thought you were going to do > something that would look like a "normal" prefix keymap. They don't prompt. Over in the other bug I received feedback from Juri which I understood as saying that only a patch using the prompting approach would be likely to be merged, so I've been working on that. Sounds like things are more undecided than I thought? I myself am mostly neutral between the standard prefix and prompting approaches. Since I'm waiting on assign@gnu.org anyway, maybe it would be best to wait a bit longer on this discussion. -- Sean Whitton