On 2021-03-09, 15:54 +0000, "Basil L. Contovounesios" wrote: > Protesilaos Stavrou writes: > >> Thank you! I have amended the patch using the format you recommended. > > Thanks, LGTM. > > Have you been able to verify that the tarball is created properly, > and especially that the contained .info file is nonempty? No, the build always gives me errors. Though I assumed something was wrong on my end (I am not familiar with makefiles). This is not just with the modus-themes. Same for something like project.el. Please see the attached file with the backtrace. On 2021-03-09, 11:46 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> - ("modus-operandi-theme":url "https://gitlab.com/protesilaos/modus-themes") >>> - ("modus-vivendi-theme" :url "https://gitlab.com/protesilaos/modus-themes") >> Also wondering if we need to do anything special before "ripping off >> this bandaid"[1], or can we also get away with the money like MELPA? > > I think "overwrite modus-operandi-theme and modus-vivendi-theme with > a small package which depends on modus-themes for compatibility and prints some > kind of deprecation warning, maybe via the autoload mechanism" is the > better way forward (but this can be done calmly once the `modus-themes` > is confirmed to be in good shape). Yes, we can look into this once the package is confirmed to work. I have no strong opinion about how to handle the old packages. I prefer to go with whatever is easier for you. -- Protesilaos Stavrou protesilaos.com