From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52053: 29.0.50; Nonsensical button "C-x C-f" in scratch buffer Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:17:24 +0100 Message-ID: <874k7z414r.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87czmr5gr7.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87czmr5gr7.fsf@yahoo.com> <612d659daa29af13c2e5@heytings.org> <83y25c5wn0.fsf@gnu.org> <612d659daabc268505c4@heytings.org> <83pmqo5vmp.fsf@gnu.org> <612d659daad03d6bc73d@heytings.org> <834k805nil.fsf@gnu.org> <612d659daa026d901515@heytings.org> <83v90g467g.fsf@gnu.org> <612d659daa5de288a9f9@heytings.org> <83czmn4ekx.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmn46d5.fsf@gmail.com> <83tufz2mqv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34380"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, gregory@heytings.org, 52053@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 12:18:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZFT-0008kb-4X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:18:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZFQ-0003PQ-Rs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:18:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZEv-0003O7-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZEv-00025P-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:18:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZEv-0006Au-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:18:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52053.163792545423701 (code B ref 52053); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2021 11:17:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZET-0006AD-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:35415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqZER-00069z-Rk for 52053@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id i5so17899700wrb.2 for <52053@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 03:17:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=laM08w40nPRnty24DE7pJY6vVmSrrTDTf1OKAeX3mYA=; b=gMoZB2SffSe/tDXSDM6BFpteZfPjasSdiQBoKpu6spyyK8FNTd7Cu6fETDlIDm8Ujy ZsFjTIEfYi8DxWYJWnSfo04VwxrA96ERyXg47FBNSBcYwFnBPg7xhs71NVDwo/iCnzcs QHR9ptIelanALVoHa7M3bY4sSoGZnhpiVlUe7d9iMJaceWnQip3T74sT4rWiDRo48zOu 2MaGnnt7AXf+UgDQTFJ01cgawEN34sgOORXeY3afkDWTqBQGlvhnxHcOjyEzqrGUJ44J CUpuFZhdo4wKTzIi8NCjg0FFKhM2Jn7kzpjJL0z8ADsXNCI3oK4Whk2psV04oPBXqlZi DBgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=laM08w40nPRnty24DE7pJY6vVmSrrTDTf1OKAeX3mYA=; b=NJcXOPGioMF9cwvQvvr97Gs9ephAcZ4vZP0wvAf/S9FAU5YrPJWpk/l3h4V2G2NQRj k6DEQ7p1rJJSJ1SpusjnoImkZypUdwnR3dRLfPTpyNbNcxyWYXEf7obX834oGo8/Sjes IqLGU4Rb9dO+Pb38uwvMOqFyTPpF7czt8T4SiXtxbBRkL8DL5aHnqkPBMmvOpd5TkFx5 bXG3gujOyIY9u7Q2w3fRTFqD5dO3/vgSQg+LOrRwx6b5384sz6T+UWg1DGdfH1glssQ9 awG9DZHzvNeGz95XyxNl8QphDZshXJ++J69I7YKKAllsf92B/6Pdf27/l5sTDj6HXm0S QpnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dIq+lQNp6Uz7VJOoVfXFz8SdQWuVP0FlwbgVVPYoFTkGeay55 BtQEvDv5T5L4ye4WyXPMNOM9aLvJxak= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySok7MlPedAOf991osz2XOa1QFEvuJqNyNQJYxxsWdtrJoZMPlbEIhCEEbU/3fCw0IeshubQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5272:: with SMTP id l18mr13390558wrc.208.1637925445757; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 03:17:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:ebe2:f5e7:9e61:417f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm13691842wmq.34.2021.11.26.03.17.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 03:17:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83tufz2mqv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:13:28 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220862 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:13:28 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: Gregory Heytings , luangruo@yahoo.com, >> larsi@gnus.org, 52053@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:24:22 +0100 >>=20 Eli> Thanks. This approach is fine by me, but the variable you introdu= ced Eli> should not be internal, and it probably should be called out in NE= WS Eli> (in the Lisp section), because I believe the intent was to allow o= ther Eli> callers to use it, even though currently we have only one such cal= ler. >>=20 >> So a variable that code can set to say 'use this other variable'? Eli> Maybe I'm missing something, but where did you see that this new Eli> variable is used to set help-link-key-to-documentation? It=CA=BCs checked to see if help-link-key-to-documentation should be used (not set). >> Again, why not just bind `help-link-key-to-documentation' directly? Eli> Presumably, because help-link-key-to-documentation is a user optio= n, Eli> and an option which is specific to Help commands? Right. So Help commands should bind it as necessary. Robert --=20