From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:08:34 +0100 Message-ID: <874k7xg07x.fsf@web.de> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> <1adc044f473776dc3748@heytings.org> <83v90ouyp7.fsf@gnu.org> <664b6d0147a183b153f7@heytings.org> <87tufxg78p.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bcbeda91dd8b@heytings.org> <83fsrhztvn.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf19g529.fsf@web.de> <838rx9zs9r.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7bxg2d8.fsf@web.de> <835ysdzq4s.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmlg1rz.fsf@web.de> <8335nhzoqn.fsf@gnu.org> <878rx9g0mo.fsf@web.de> <831r31zoft.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: gregory@heytings.org, 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 15:09:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyO7-0002eR-Rb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:09:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyO6-0006J2-Hx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyNy-0006If-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyNy-0003t9-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyNy-00055j-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.163802212519547 (code B ref 51883); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 14:08:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyNh-00055D-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:08:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:58755) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyNf-000550-5c for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:08:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1638022116; bh=uC1jXo9danFfoVWlWhvsNHCNC/Cxpp0oRn9LUJASr44=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Dyzdwacp2qxSazulLUagIj92y4T2brzj1NIOJxtOwVBaFlntboEzM5/H0NwFzumN4 dz21PBqmnkz0fi1F0RukPOxs86hgFEZwlix11zddM7ZVpSMd0cJoQpRC99puEUSEg1 IZHcC3A/NagBKjSd1x481jyvhuqNSqk0p0R30gR4= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.208.225.87]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MIc7b-1mntq51MvN-00EWuX; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:08:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831r31zoft.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:02:46 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JzVrJvMkjTOi5ZL5xoky/5wySzWRp7i4jZNjylBOngNSnrJIuvn sDh8aaT9jbThWeZ/rDhjpVaEe4UJrRTJKgP6nnOrzOc4/cakEI6Q8dG7DksT3+hk8FpP5RD E794D4xwamjh22YBn7RHaJZfwtxT1zhrKYCb5bE5pK8HwPnf36445gMHwTHZhbSUagWDgx3 y1nwxV4mSG8SFQlu9Xqog== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:DK8C4OYWTU0=:/3i2caSey+8HOoIyQK/+Al Og1+ZYjZL2If3q+zWUiJL4WmAwidqxRi2mI9ZrxXDupgWvzCAXVqDaGpJPMrX8iN0yP/ZvPLP gA/ntyoTmwzwfOivv/WmaphIscsexfx7uc8aF/o7PMi+O7DkGFkk+vyTIqEtT9OOEHN7rbZft U6W01B6G1ZcnUYkIlHYxwyxZ+g7Re7mKWLZb4YaD6cvv0qzScXwHUNry4pEsZOqHtSy+dQw1L Umch1PayKOlV4m+sRl3Xpy5P9Bm1iTQX0831ijWxtY8XFX+24sjU7k5JhosSzu5/WOOKEfHR0 1F02r+2I725W79FQDkbMKCtlZWAFuB+sJLP+p912sQb+mAde6zweeW2aA6Nc6ZYaYq4NojdHg 7E0uZnvVndNquxkYNpCcR0WKaAjWuQ4MxGb1lbqhwBVnUaABslTFDUvgzqUTCcjfseAZ4zPXN 1t+ZoN1XFp+Ps6d3q0KIPnJ/5FEcDVuZ42X9JoXcfpe2bT7NnmQYjMCsWOFzBPj9to/pMlivl BZMgNXCNTQnSY1k0TnP/mr9D3A3/cn+aoiN81uCmRjT+dyNVfz5nkBFkN5X0vpaXU8Y/TxFUu pMPwisVb8O0O/SIJYcUQ6T9VIsMBcxcbVq3FzP826uJYa1MmA9Et1xVvI0+P7ZDdDZV4vDWKI ogaAp0MxPlbKZeFIVgFCTkcXCzWOXnScSt/s037LR1O8NwcPW7R1eOs3AfmGk80CF2Yj8Xepy q/QjVgtAmKK3bjdINRJRIdbe/QWB/Lnvsx90URy2lbEwpejCwGjdW76tYxLdy1/N+EFw/9r1 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220928 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It is maybe better to ignore an argument of zero, i.e. behave as if > there was no argument. If we do that (and I don't object) - what should negative arguments do? Should -N be equivalent to +N? Michael.