From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60740: [PATCH 0/2] emoji changes Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 13:05:28 +0100 Message-ID: <874js1vdo7.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <83leli3nly.fsf@gnu.org> <20230201230918.550-1-jonas@bernoul.li> <83zg9tu91v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="808"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60740@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 13:06:56 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHJo-000AXf-GC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 13:06:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHJP-00031J-2x; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHIw-0002rB-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHIw-0000ex-Br for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHIv-0003q6-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jonas Bernoulli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 12:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60740 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60740-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60740.167551233814725 (code B ref 60740); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 12:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60740) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2023 12:05:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHIY-0003pR-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:05:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:37590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOHIT-0003p8-QI for 60740@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 07:05:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7D716267; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 13:05:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1675512331; bh=MZhaZa11euMUL4QhyUK7ahto Se0xaLTij2FZ4G9wtf0=; b=dwdWavsbLj4rv6FbP2vHxEVonY+mRw3JJY+nMk7j W/TqiJPwGAq8FHncE+WsXyukauvK8tZOoY+ucIPdRehHPxjqxFBGOHT3dFFVxavT Vht9FWqsutJw13v6J9P3OPukS/QrmwCFbLstLcPHNxIMM7B3+5ogO2q65Ee7dlSM 0Jc= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 8Ikfq6stjrxj; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 13:05:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED9F3162A9; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 13:05:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83zg9tu91v.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254771 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks. > > Would it make sense to install the first patch on the emacs-29 branch > and the second on master? Or did I misunderstand your explanations > above? AFAIU, the first patch solves the immediate issue in this bug, > right? That's correct and it would make sense to do it like this. At the same time I think that it is risky both to install and not install the second patch on emacs-29. On the one hand past changes to transient did not break emoji, even though I did not specifically try to prevent that. On the other the risk of that happening going forward is not zero. If Lars finds the time to look at the refactoring before the pre-release, I think it would be best to install it on emacs-29, but if not, I am find with it going on master instead.