From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tony Zorman via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66567: [PATCH] use-package: Add ignored-files support to :vc keyword Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 20:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: <874jbg11p6.fsf@hyperspace> References: <877cnn4z2v.fsf@hyperspace> <87ttq5u9fj.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttq5bx2y.fsf@hyperspace> <87r0l91vww.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0l9fsl1.fsf@hyperspace> <871qd91l9e.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkc59wv8.fsf@hyperspace> <87wmutfe8l.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm0hvmwj.fsf@hyperspace> <87msve9mri.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Tony Zorman Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66567@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 02 20:58:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdv-000AB8-2c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 20:58:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdi-0002qn-3U; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdg-0002qF-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdg-00042K-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2be1-0006MJ-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tony Zorman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 18:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66567 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66567.171467629724432 (code B ref 66567); Thu, 02 May 2024 18:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2024 18:58:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdJ-0006M0-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.151]:42480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2bdF-0006Lm-Ap for 66567@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 14:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VVjqV6p11z9tCT; Thu, 2 May 2024 20:57:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1714676262; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eicdFPSW5iQnslRiqqOZ9u1ObvggfOHxwTDbTXRk1/c=; b=O7YVmrS+U806+PVSKyl84U+PY3gqDJN7qmV13D56CzOUiZIZEe3IuSUfLVV40Y81w7oPGM jbWvrXgDVVXz3bEgrrlPLBMnGE3nQiDMrSASjKUS88ooEp7X5+IZKXbdgZbkqTv6PiW/qE k7uVX0EfAT6+iKU+bTZYZLpYGV/C8FlhFOCY8ndJ2AvLqPIq1xbgnX+p4+42ongC4PPQsH LnIU5zzMVe3cGetc1quFUoAGBSiN5EfAZpNMk9gEjMyyxgtGWY3FTmwZlXvbaRl07wYpTA Iy2ik7q5dD3eoONVUXK7a3hI70wvR/uKVfEVRb8ikK2Op9DIo2o+hvl1Mrg2bw== In-Reply-To: <87msve9mri.fsf@posteo.net> X-MBO-RS-META: x3gmabzef18kwd9zj8osw8tzz3oqigyb X-MBO-RS-ID: 572cfcb6275d73b7453 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:284346 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 16 2023 07:32, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Tony Zorman writes: > >> On Tue, Nov 07 2023 21:24, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >>> Tony Zorman writes: >>>> Now I'm a bit confused: where exactly? Inside of use-package or >>>> package-vc? Either way, I think raising an error when the user inputs >>>> nonsense is totally justified=E2=80=94I'd just like that error to be >>>> understandable as quickly as possible. >>> >>> I was thinking that package-vc should emit an error, but that >>> use-package could emit a warning, in case a new keyword is added to >>> package-vc specifications but hasn't yet been added to the use-package >>> layer -- mainly because I don't use the latter and am not that familiar >>> with the code. >> >> On first thought this sounds good, but I think one would end up having >> to sync the actual state of things in two places. What if package-vc.el >> had a place where it stored all available commands? Then the use-package >> integration could just use that. I think it would also be easier to have >> this codified somewhere, rather than having to check the manual every >> time. > > This sounds like a better solution, I can add a constant with all the > symbols that you can then use. I am still a bit busy, so I cannot > promise when I'll manage to do so, but I'll ping you when the changes > have been pushed. Can I perhaps bump this myself instead? :) I'd really like to see this merged; if it helps move things along a bit quicker, I can also make the necessary changes to package-vc.el. Tony --=20 Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/