From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Okamsn via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#72753: Different output between SBCL `loop` and Emacs `cl-loop` Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:55:07 +0000 Message-ID: <873b4331-a9c1-423a-a02b-acea0b92cbec@protonmail.com> Reply-To: Okamsn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14567"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 72753@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 22 03:56:48 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx4C-0003cd-4h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:56:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx3t-0003lt-GG; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:56:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx3p-0003ld-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx3i-00015O-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:56:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=k9G2FeyFDlxndgcMMaM0QnnANHtm72sm+HjRXCE4TNM=; b=hNkH4c1qjeG/KwhsHbrqwrbh+Bt/Cr6Gy9xSp2n4rdoGdE2eAScaAIjiV6Ap3C1hr9OFQ+1CWSyHPer2G+wa8QJzH6kiSu7UDycsNfUPGAGaLBOBgAOmdIFBfWCyTcXqSD8Rn8lhxahbTsSI9fFz5/Hp6ajAvsjpvxYyO3RTKi6HwR4vDmXflQ/u0AuW7tSlgCdpNji2Ao+ZVXHIv9iVt+0UHFoU3xiIkByQSMDzo5yvjPF7+2fKdxH7IsOZdRrMUZakCduWwGnOcN25dR9O90QF/6EoF9pS1DrsZUFhN1Sfj42Xc8ygfQuUb9wFYHfGOQt0+oQVQNr2gdoJ1ety9g==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx4Q-0007h6-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Okamsn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 72753 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.172429176629495 (code B ref -1); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2024 01:56:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx3W-0007ff-Jf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx3V-0007fY-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx2l-0003UR-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgx2g-0000wP-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:55:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1724291710; x=1724550910; bh=k9G2FeyFDlxndgcMMaM0QnnANHtm72sm+HjRXCE4TNM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ZG+efmYbKf7F9qSdhuW82Y+Od/PRMgd13BQXOJdbdCL5844Hi/DdgS+JwawpR8Y6l dakHQ9PVzzvzwv/Nms1QvhULYoVchd93uz8RMZEqObzZvIA1QLD+oPyBbG986IIRMC TB2hhlV+FQysqgSGZPtHhx/VZMYus9sVxrm1ogvZVrZlIIY19H1V92JLe6Y/Qo+5tp b8d0AGNRDStyqVNPYM0dyXtkSV0l/RL8QxjuIJs1EszHvsTL4UtiZXtbW0TY5tqL5k Sv4I5NG627rXrsYtl1tuHzBxSCPkGHHxVm5B3UD4tI35aXyYSl/bpFxa+YrscWhjwc 5BvbCNbvG4pcA== Feedback-ID: 25935600:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 090df1f11e7302cfca202be4ed7ec3a06b62ba5b Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=okamsn@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:290509 Archived-At: Hello, The following in SBCL 2.1.11 produces 3, which I expected. (loop for i in '(1 2 3) for j from 1 finally (return j)) The following in Emacs 29 produces 4, which I did not expect. (cl-loop for i in '(1 2 3) for j from 1 finally (cl-return j)) This is a simplified example that only shows the difference. I don't know what the standard behavior is, but I personally believe=20 that the SBCL output makes more sense. Thank you.