From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6591: 24.0.50; incorrect doc for `catch' Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:59:38 +0200 Message-ID: <8739vq9td1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <831vbcbl7n.fsf@gnu.org> <5500EFEE9A854408ABF0FE400497FE2D@us.oracle.com> <83tyo7aiay.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxtz9zbn.fsf@gnu.org> <3ACAED77613643B7B2FC0207DDE11F11@us.oracle.com> <83y6djuyah.fsf@gnu.org> <38AC360676154EFF8DF9F35945B6EFAE@us.oracle.com> <83sk3qv922.fsf@gnu.org> <877hl2a0zs.fsf@gmail.com> <83lj9iv0dg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278847825 10152 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2010 11:30:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6591@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 11 13:30:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXujm-0003TU-KB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:30:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44814 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXujl-0001sY-Dm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36091 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXujb-0001q6-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXujZ-0001KC-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXujZ-0001K8-H7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXuHO-0000ZG-7C; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6591.12788460382175 (code B ref 6591); Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2010 11:00:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXuGz-0000Z2-VP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXuGx-0000Yx-3q for 6591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1869813fxm.3 for <6591@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:00:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lK9r7wcOnWwWe7GQlGw8gctN9a2YEreuLeD4yKs3xxo=; b=VX7z1dx+aBd7efl1XOaJHA8vy2OQI0qJ90ITgWFjvEQ/qdm6MwYbpLJIYjThwKGxgZ mebWgvU1A0uE3CfM58EYxMnAErLyrLJNWyk8lA7FE8ZkP8N/5cEi3FCxAvV3KHjKkaC8 ihUoCJexw6zs5sw+gBGTTR3muwwrdFx9wMNA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jDzj75o7/h4yvCoS7MBuRKq7m6Uc9HPDQaDpGGgobPGM7KKUHt8tNQff14MBFH0KgW 059TVLeDDGULwIxSHar4DzhDwSpz+56LFCYnA9AYMNnuteRKSyxiD3+4FQRjcTVpbKQO VCQLqQ55sOKpD1Kbg96QNP/Lsabc9V0eUawvc= Original-Received: by 10.223.122.6 with SMTP id j6mr1905500far.71.1278846034633; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i1sm6518526faa.5.2010.07.11.04.00.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:00:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lj9iv0dg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:22:35 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38372 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: =3D?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw=3D=3D?=3D >> Cc: Drew Adams , 6591@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard > Stallman >> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:14:47 +0200 >>=20 >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >> > Using FORM... is okay, but will need more extensive changes, so I'd >> > rather not do it. I'd like to simply remove the dots after BODY, and >> > explain in the text that BODY can consist of one or more forms. >> > >> > Does anyone see any reason why keeping the dots in BODY... will have >> > some didactical importance? Richard? Stefan? Yidong? >>=20 >> Well, just look at `when' -- ISTM it has the very same "problem" as >> discussed here. And it's probably not the only one/two. > > Sorry, I don't get your point. Sure, there are places in the manual > that use "FORM...", but that doesn't necessarily mean it's the only > possible way of describing that. "BODY..." is used in quite a few > places as well, and I was only talking about those. You were asking about BODY... `when' uses BODY..., and IMO in `when' `BODY...' means the very same thing as in `catch' (i.e., "any number of forms"), which you're now apparently about to change. =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n