From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8006: 23.2.93; rmail-mime says "Not a MIME message" Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:23:17 -0500 Message-ID: <8739ny12fe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297211836 25224 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2011 00:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 01:37:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmy35-0008Up-WF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:37:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51192 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmy2t-0005Ay-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47616 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmy2T-0004uk-RF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmy2R-0003QU-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmy2R-0003QQ-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmxi3-000570-56; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:15:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8006.129721047819604 (code B ref 8006); Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2011 00:14:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmxhe-000569-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmxhb-00055x-6f for 8006@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014143.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p190NH2A009169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3EFEC1602B5; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:23:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:33:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:15:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44008 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It seems like iff a message doesn't have the Mime-Version header, > typing `v' (rmail-mime) in the Rmail buffer signals an error "Not a > MIME message". Is this expected? Sounds like a misfeature to me. You mean a MIME message with no Mime-Version header? What mailer sends that?