From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9361: 24.0.50; default value of `dired-do-chmod' Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:38:04 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <8739b2ymtn.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <03BC028E352D4173B985B3B34DF3193A@us.oracle.com> <87zkiyabea.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <1BDADB23B4434E0C9330F1B010F1E1CE@us.oracle.com> <88378BBDA1F142B6A8CFF3961B3DEDDF@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327629222 2806 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2012 01:53:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9361@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 02:53:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0P-00010i-6l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:53:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0O-0003Qm-RE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0L-0003Lv-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0K-0006ov-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0K-0006or-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0s-0006VT-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9361 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 9361-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9361.132762920724962 (code B ref 9361); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 01:53:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0I-0006UZ-S1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:60201 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqb0H-0006UN-3M for 9361@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518DE451C7F3; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:51:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <88378BBDA1F142B6A8CFF3961B3DEDDF@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:27:29 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56063 Archived-At: You are citing the message that I already replied to. And it seems we are in full agreement on this issue. But since this is not a regression, why are you asking to fix it now?