From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10714: SHR leaves too much trailing whitespace Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:39:52 +0100 Message-ID: <8739apnmyv.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328467221 2661 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2012 18:40:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10714@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 19:40:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70e-0003zM-Jq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:40:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57518 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70e-0005y7-74 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70b-0005y2-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70a-0007Ht-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:17 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70a-0007Hn-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru71J-0004ar-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10714 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10714-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10714.132846725217641 (code B ref 10714); Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10714) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2012 18:40:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru719-0004aT-FT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:52 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru716-0004aK-FC for 10714@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:40:50 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru70F-0004hX-Fp; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:39:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1Ru70F-0004hX-Fp MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329071996.14225@o8rFPA1PG7cdrgth0bETwQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56532 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > So I think we should trim all trailing whitespace after rendering, > which will solve at least some of those problems. I think that's a very good idea. The final stage in the rendering process would be just to delete all trailing whitespace. It seems intuitive to me that this would create a better result than the current rendering, but right now I'm now able to find any HTML emails here that renders badly in this manner. (And I'd like to test it to see if there are any unforeseen negative effects.) Do you happen to have such an email handy that you could forward to me? If not, I can search around my spam mailbox some more... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome