From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:57:42 +0200 Organization: Emacs Helm Message-ID: <873920ojg9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bogubqjy.fsf@gnu.org> <873925ebpd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipb031aj.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <87sja4t48j.fsf@gmail.com> <9D98A7802F07462887BCC67BE194243B@us.oracle.com> <87haqildr1.fsf@gmail.com> <877grduvfz.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehlkoobb.fsf@gmail.com> <29382156B26B45EE84512961BC10CB44@us.oracle.com> <877grcol5q.fsf@gmail.com> <6AE89E4E12C2423DA49CF53F19CF3E81@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348937934 2677 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 16:58:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12507@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 18:59:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NT-0000Zi-8u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:58:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45981 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NO-00049Y-0L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NL-00049I-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NK-0007D6-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NK-0007D2-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0NZ-0006cA-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12507.134893789125361 (code B ref 12507); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2012 16:58:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Mj-0006av-I1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:39506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Mh-0006ao-5S for 12507@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq7so815825wib.15 for <12507@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=FKD7fBtaaiYP5o+EvIBs06hIsiED9TCIssA9nnhAvVc=; b=I0igd7vm0/Y+C8rkazCNVHb86RdXskh9rKCwS5xMbPfClveaJ6JEq7aSjJAmhEa6hp sz/NPUA72AhS+tm3m35Jqddt0ju5Yyb2YBm6zfpigSUI1YtJdDN2wS1ss1tcWsUIJZjc 0RZT9wb5qW+Fmjn+KVGj0+miK7uQmQNVth0KPeHZlFLZO7dc3LTHqlXyzF+oERF++gqr f0tQXIJo+jAzQziER1Eb42UIEZoF9gOrSGshA634uwNULoR5+GP5ppDTDo6GZPOnbQGn 54TwIpp9T7FozF72K5lNx8KeNQ5eitYJ5Z6dCDUNe9qdrbsbA/sPFXnNsQzll1bOXMyr zG8Q== Original-Received: by 10.180.82.164 with SMTP id j4mr4427608wiy.18.1348937870177; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cl8sm6005400wib.10.2012.09.29.09.57.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6AE89E4E12C2423DA49CF53F19CF3E81@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:50:00 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65016 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> What I want to say is, why writing to buffer "*Bookmarks*", renaming >> this buffer to the filename buffer, and then saving it? >> Just use find-file-noselect, write data and save. > > I see. You're talking only about the first arg of `with-current-buffer'. I > thought you were talking about `write-file' vs `save-buffer' and claiming that > there were two writes with the former. > > Yes, of course. There is no need to use a different buffer, *Bookmarks*, > instead of the return value of `find-file-noselect'. I thought we had already > covered that. > > There still might be a reason to use `write-file' instead of `save-buffer'. But > as I say, what's important is to decide about whether to allow backing up (and > visiting the file). Agree. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997