From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22244: 25.0.50; Make eww use display-buffer to display eww buffer Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:02:42 +0100 Message-ID: <8737upm9cd.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bn9dno9q.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451149461 27109 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 17:04:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 18:04:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsGG-0004pi-TP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:04:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsGG-00021K-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:04:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsGD-00021D-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsGA-0002Uc-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsG9-0002UY-TH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:04:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsG9-0002eN-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145114939710136 (code B ref -1); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 17:03:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41913 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFR-0002dP-Gw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFQ-0002dE-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFK-0002Qa-Dp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFK-0002QV-Ai for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFJ-0001ye-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFG-0002Q2-C5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsFG-0002Py-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsEt-0002Pj-OA; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:02:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bn9dno9q.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:54:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCsEt-0002Pj-OA MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451754163.95962@BjCzN4jonXcHK9FNhGAfPg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110704 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Wouldn't it be better to let eww use display-buffer instead of > switch-to-buffer in several places (at least, when calling eww and > eww-browse-url, probably some more)? display-buffer's behavior can be > controlled via binding variables, while display-buffer makes the same a > horror. I'm not familiar with display-buffer, but by default it seems to work like pop-to-buffer? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no