From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8217: 23.3; Runtime segmentation fault when compiled with -O2 on GNU/Linux Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:34:43 -0400 Message-ID: <8737mi6mx8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <19832.36134.751125.2009@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <19832.48987.620735.717352@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87twf080mw.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <22437.58952.92130.137875@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470490527 17053 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2016 13:35:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:35:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cc: 8217@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 06 15:35:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kz-0003PR-Ua for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:35:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kw-0003nP-Oz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kr-0003kT-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kk-0003FU-9l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kk-0003FQ-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kk-0003Mb-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8217 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8217-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8217.147049048312902 (code B ref 8217); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8217) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 13:34:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kR-0003Lx-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:35444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1kQ-0003Lc-5B; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m101so322639741ioi.2; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=La62XrQr8UPXNFLMJqcsuNi8j0XUnjqw2jAOYYEGP/I=; b=CzFdVLfNLo2ZOkmuIg5DQH1EIOoxpR6P0uCeBrf4ow22W+i6WaOjbv4/aZOPIH3NuI 4syIyPYRaTiGpSibRtLPHShZPJSwl1n2Pz3oSHbiM+f2teTvBpsOWIGPNxCBvy1l0UeI Cw9eTfAacc5+K33qVcm8FFAjEQskvfPDkIbGDha2wEkUiG8rbF+3kdeoGslqo0D9T1tD IkRVZFtQ+IYWCj5UPiSxKgORD/N4SgEGyFfIi4BD/0E2es226shkXBDFoPLEoe/SzcqC cInT9irpfQVYfjG50tWa0lOVeAYlRCSl5/A/LeZJJhGQteriN0X1KADkrpevcsnU26jA sBKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=La62XrQr8UPXNFLMJqcsuNi8j0XUnjqw2jAOYYEGP/I=; b=H3hTnWjiKhPWsV5FESnF9s6JZwCaN3CkVChgaikYCMpJ1wIa+QZgptwIZirUV/om9u /0Q89D22n3GITTh1tc9l5W4WnfgRdhj+xaaujg+JEgW4U1rnG/59xdiyjRWubzEKp0b4 6NFUObZooILheywp8MoEMKkcgSntfPsGPCVHd0M6+oFXv3Z09s1akHzdBx7HUaQ/zHBc VQUN/NhVGtzT/XoX3u0ALoJw0FwMmVSWcdmi4D6k6dflcQ6qCHAaNH9JJd8yGKEnjdVl +POjhfnh8n/kGvaepiunb6XT7R9oTq1EVvO2B2ln/BsidmA6Ily5g9cG/QaqgSxSqCKD DMAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouubz4+kLtbPO/nVQG4uP1faxANUBGASoJHYjtNx/e/F2cg4/EH0w3Cl2gwWdeADhw== X-Received: by 10.107.20.82 with SMTP id 79mr82317492iou.108.1470490475894; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d71sm10182271ioj.33.2016.08.06.06.34.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22437.58952.92130.137875@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:29:44 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121898 Archived-At: tags 8217 unreproducible close 8217 quit Ulrich Mueller writes: >>>>>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, npostavs wrote: > >> I guess this is fixed by now? I usually build --with-toolkit=lucid >> (which I read in configure.ac is a synonym for athena), and I >> haven't hit this. > > Looking through Gentoo ebuild history, I find that the workaround of > adding -fno-strict-aliasing to CFLAGS wasn't present for version 24.1, > and there never were any bugs reported to us. This seems to indicate > that the problem had disappeared already in early Emacs 24 versions. > > However, I also cannot reproduce this any more with Emacs 23.4 and > GCC 5.4.0 (nor with GCC 4.9.3). So it may well be that this issue > wasn't with Emacs but with GCC. Okay, closing as unreproducible.