From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:14:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8737duses5.fsf@rosalinde> References: <87zig756p8.fsf@rosalinde> <87a886wuyi.fsf@rosalinde> <87lgroyq4x.fsf@rosalinde> <8337dw6ljs.fsf@gnu.org> <87h92cym36.fsf@rosalinde> <878tnnzwdg.fsf@rosalinde> <83wpb75w99.fsf@gnu.org> <877f36skwy.fsf@rosalinde> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490904994 25380 195.159.176.226 (30 Mar 2017 20:16:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:16:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26274@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Michal Nazarewicz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 22:16:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUP-0004Px-4N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:16:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUR-0002ef-Hh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUI-0002eN-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUE-0000Qt-3E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUE-0000Qi-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgUD-000698-Oa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26274 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26274-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26274.149090490423561 (code B ref 26274); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 20:15:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53230 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgTH-00067w-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctgTE-00067A-PK for 26274@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([83.135.28.102]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4Gup-1c3EEg2uGJ-00rraK; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:14:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Michal Nazarewicz's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:11:37 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jcgVk0mnKHG0DiuyzwiD8sq0KFoNEIITShCaAdniKYDfnH5ysQz ot8mRbGyL+kxvFNd1QXj5ylJyX92T/AOTOG1iXYPnD7JHYIWgI7nc/vXrLSGAREosLPFcms 2l/DlaWlz4z/3b5DKfoxccAPI/JR3NLBgLCMveg7r69upXwT4q9rJzsUlzxx0cLnM4Xc+cV SN7KWYluAcYIwz+t9CVdA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:bbjtyth91q0=:0WTdyecV7a8riHhCw8vT+2 8MgCpkRqn+Ot0ndZFF66U+LKbtBwyxX7cK3F9LnACIJLfB4gL2qKaihN9D6OwU1GYOs140Vlj 3VgNkZo4dzZO15xU/1zJ5a0fWcRtxYrvrvqvdLhigfifUcenPzjMdCiA7sDf0KezVxkDs1tm4 weghmEKqBwkok84a9acapxgRajzLHDPPk/YV+cu/dEAp/6B9HLsdhMfQbdxQuFzS8VptSJmRD G3wyHU/ll7sWAlA4jlSQmkFgJIaeU142yTND5geKzEH3WeH7KSfql86GeRxPrL/2MUyn2rPk4 hmjm311jix14Dj8wmA3O2lw+mEukO9zTxAn27+a3Xeeo5Ehr0+tyTKCO4BkofDwCCF/p5n9lZ zeuwbe35RAUWQEwq/nWQ9sOKM6wosvRA2wYqEL8jpUitVchgXfO4hty2caJmDrVs5w0R4dunX bT4fB/tIm71tOlmVzNcImDqlBriv/QdOqSxLcLAOJk9U1KAT+Yjrsw/4A5oBelP90qttieHL4 iczg56P17ZO1On4Ftszm0F/TFyCQo0MatyILSobpCMkeHNKBJ0u5y4wNI9kzSEpe8mGo6GUDv EkG8MDJ/DjXcQwiSuXj8racu6DriArkgQfY2UzZzKhpgEw6yoRmzFbzeJPywcs73cfF+OvBkU 1l1fbneWxDG1ZABj9gp/4DYFCCWrVNSO5HIj79KsDjNAdwAL2W70qivMlG+D1/egU83jqhvSM qHAc+m3NgyiOIUJc96hx9eCBDN9vK6TWDRwkYbt3h3NMUGoJ4kHZWBt/8eK5MU2FoBS87XLn X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131110 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:11:37 +0200 Michal Nazarewicz wr= ote: >> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:18:42 +0200 Michal Nazarewicz = wrote: >>> Stephen, could you test Emacs at=20 >>> >>> git fetch https://notabug.org/mina86/emacs.git ac7004999db96c7d >>> >>> Completion behaves correctly at this commit. Since it=E2=80=99s schedu= led to be >>> pushed soon, I think just rolling forward is the way to go. > > On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Stephen Berman wrote: >> I invoked the above command on my local master branch, but git said: >> >> fatal: Couldn't find remote ref ac7004999db96c7d > > Perhaps it=E2=80=99s not possible to fetch a commit after all. Try: > > git fetch https://notabug.org/mina86/emacs.git master > git checkout ac7004999db96c7d I couldn't tell whether the first command would change my local master branch, so I decided to make a new branch first: git fetch https://notabug.org/mina86/emacs.git master:bug26274 git checkout bug26274 git checkout ac7004999db96c7d make If I did this right and built the version with your patch, then I can confirm that with it substring completion with case-folding again works as expected. Thanks. Steve Berman