From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31498: [PATCH] Notify systemd in daemon-initialized Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:41:36 -0400 Message-ID: <8736xy2jpb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180518174031.12514-1-mail@lucaswerkmeister.de> <87bmcm3frw.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528418413 2391 195.159.176.226 (8 Jun 2018 00:40:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 00:40:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31498@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lucas Werkmeister Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 08 02:40:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Rl-0000Rp-M6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 02:40:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Tq-00039c-PP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Th-00039V-5C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Te-0000Xu-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58853) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Td-0000XT-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5Td-0002xO-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31498 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 31498-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31498.152841850811344 (code B ref 31498); Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31498) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2018 00:41:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5TP-0002wu-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:38533) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fR5TM-0002we-Uh for 31498@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id v83-v6so340948itc.3 for <31498@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:41:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E298e/Q8ZJIf9OZvpgR/ipDY+bDSEalKbKCLwyrMNCo=; b=baWRrBr8h4snEtmOJeJv5hJ3U8I2uXSvWg8q+5HxCY3vUFy9jyGGRv8DlOktbjSdyw 8EkpbnUKj6tYfCxBqmiIab3eX7QS5am23g8/kl1d1Gw7wYL6omGBDTEyrueWr1vJqj7z SXQHNY/EPTuA0cQ5WRLRG4S1cC0a7kieuzyrS5KuNoeb0CDwpzHIOigrBcQlG5mR+u1O lpO/+76/jTMbTtdHaLzqlLcZqSyPmtP0QzRrO+DFBZ6uA5rQaYhayNnFq9ntfbGCPi3p ZnfMVP0427P9nziuecinhly5o8/gCNUsjG4a0UjC68mkLSQaVSTe29/MMROzSOE0Efn4 FSUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E298e/Q8ZJIf9OZvpgR/ipDY+bDSEalKbKCLwyrMNCo=; b=XzErMrdW1eLhjakqIEJOWsPz+lV1scY7KqIiVhiKPzPWOiEzeF84Pllr05ZpF89sQe 3zI95SVvztMXrVpP58E9UiYexRv2Orp20zm2xZnTwz4nz9weSE8w6KihF3fS3POgT3sK 2OQINeVw6ruPECtIvr+OqVUfkbkZ3FIuhOjZfCHWg3YoBI2w2N4ofzhlZH6A95nUK6K6 BXaaVZMl7ZSCiVEG5P69Qlb8UJ/KM7KPZ+QZJIExGYz7l4XM/snw2L4H6a4KYQFWJ39O +qImeXJK/1XQ63PmqTtpT0bh46dXb/O7H0ANXv4PrFjaZtfaZHKlOhc6PC08HWHozuGC ft6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1XZ1iW0NdZw3Hb/2o0MOADIMt9p8QZ4V5COoBDa1dSA4RLADUt lbAh8bdwjBBqq3UGuumH4U8B9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKRpUz79pH61yiQZWey59QL5IEdiBCV0Ce1W9qNMHzrnJfxWBDDEjG6bQiu0bzI3v3XHd4Dsg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:9486:: with SMTP id j128-v6mr3980980ite.107.1528418499155; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 142-v6sm9006530ion.21.2018.06.07.17.41.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:41:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lucas Werkmeister's message of "Thu, 7 Jun 2018 23:40:08 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147151 Archived-At: Lucas Werkmeister writes: > I haven=E2=80=99t assigned copyright yet, but I=E2=80=99d be happy to do = so =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99ve tried > to get the process started on emacs-devel. Cool, since this patch will be destined for Emacs 27, there's not much urgency, so I'll wait for that to resolve before pushing. >> I think it should have a NEWS entry mentioning that Emacs now supports >> this systemd notification feature. I would probably go ahead and >> combine with #31521, since it's using the same feature. >>=20 > > Do you mean, announce both in this patch, or completely merge that patch > into this one? The latter (maybe it would have been clearer to put those two sentences in separate paragraphs). > Once I=E2=80=99ve fixed the problems locally, what=E2=80=99s the best way= to re-roll the > patch in this bug tracking system? Should I try to configure `git > send-email` to reply to the right email (and with the right bug in CC), > or perhaps use `git format-patch` and add the patch file as a regular > attachment in a manual response? Either way is fine I guess, though I've never tried 'git send-email' myself.