From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33791: 26.1; Eshell on Windows connecting to GNU/Linux machine using TRAMP and plink: env: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98c:/home/jordan/test.sh=E2=80=99:?= No such file or directory Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:38:55 +0100 Message-ID: <8736qgsp5s.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87pntyanho.fsf@gmx.com> <83zhsxap9i.fsf@gnu.org> <875zvluaby.fsf@gmx.de> <83r2e9alte.fsf@gnu.org> <87woo0s9g1.fsf@gmx.com> <83woo08cb7.fsf@gnu.org> <874lazqekr.fsf@gmx.de> <83h8ew691e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546073658 17671 195.159.176.226 (29 Dec 2018 08:54:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:54:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: jordan.t.wilson@gmx.com, 33791@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 29 09:54:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdANq-0004Vi-0D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:54:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdAPw-0008LA-N1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdAPg-00087A-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdAA8-0006As-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdAA6-00065h-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdAA6-0006dJ-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33791.154607274525417 (code B ref 33791); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2018 08:39:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40818 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdA9B-0006bt-1z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:41965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdA99-0006bO-Di for 33791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.156.5]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNIAz-1gjToH29X7-006uhJ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:38:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83h8ew691e.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:18:05 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Au9wtAz196qm8XOWidrh7O2FCF8uP4rqT1DwmKDhIqrCuQVg+jR It1Anr8UAK7XQhjBLwruPL6D3+z9BvNd5LINq8VYSWHteBCzZhebydtUM7MOb7j0em4byF0 R1wBaGuqTUEb/OwnAlPumHpPaBM7ctPxP5F74WvXubvFVmJ+w3XNj+LkQef+E7B59D9r3jz 9CLQkce5buo3yMtYNe6Qg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:GHD04iMJ1Ls=:EtiutHTj4X1XhODl3Icx4l i8k4L5U0xjNwKupza+8UWHvy5IPer9FAQNy23P3PFvZYSF3xQg8636wbGCqbeWUjGFT5f23LI ebyu5nm07A/BwX2sTEm982pLf+HMvzCYPk61kbqTEnEL4olxsbrVK/mQNSK0ru9WuHt+uGQpo 0Cmt+MmrPYTjTNPTCgEFhHvtviJiPmdsYVM+F9X1E3Y4qhBlo5aYAY04Qdr2qSh5YFQ1QgLdL UBxXHrI3yNXKXECCE8IvSwpdQGT0vF+TPt7fR449ZpuRaNXz4MaefAxdmOiBD+1CdTJwA4u9o pKHtmHIFNEHvm/kMGuiau8kt2RNACkdkxsqbVNtqhbqHO11N96KoqA1Ds3jbCSbgioZvVRC7u 6ZczZYzMnT3jewnCM7H3YfnCSLSZzZv0jKCnbZlmWSjELVugyuUtYljsQU2FT9rlyqoaYyXha 3Sz1UKUwBCskbdJ+1z0MyKkW/9AlsaYJHtebX8gCu/tyy2KicR2o+aDmrYgYknaB3TOjaoP4y W2snkzg/9vkhzF3KCOcp35fw2ugxPoYJcf2iy9KYeLTYyxE+uZsTxL4bkci1Kz1QEz8aOqZ/Y 3miG7vVr9EKYBIEgyIDsjyPyaOAgYXmd+JNh6oXnGOv5uNpxwO1naCz+mCT2n6EhFYQCFoTXu txutt3TyoEjvR8YggCqlUUXqeDkvHmNoN7iD4OBoHx1DQEPfocIzDmK5p4pquEwLXafG8+Ukm Ky8g29ddEADQFFeg/0Xd0G4eLbeM5yFr9yWvzVrmp3nNDov+sdPNB31lv2LiiiZn69QRQNnk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153976 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I've tried to debug it, but no chance to do it on Windows. >> Debugging C sources is a no-go for me there. > > Can you tell why? I do that all the time, so maybe I could help. When I can find a WIndows machine, I can install Emacs and debug Lisp sources. Installing a C compiler, building Emacs from sources, and debugging C sources under Windows is out of my scope, on a borrowed or stolen machine I have under my control for a short time. >> Works for me, also on Windows, but I have modified it slightly in order >> to make it more explicit. I have applied >> >> > + (or >> > + ;; locate-file doesn't support remote file names, so detect them >> > + ;; and support them here by hand. >> > + (and (file-remote-p (expand-file-name dir)) >> ... > > You mean, testing file-remote-p _in_addition_ to the tests I proposed? No, instead of file-name-absolute-p. > Is the file-name-absolute-p test needed if we test with file-remote-p? No. >> It is also OK for me to push it to the emacs-26 branch. > > Done. Thanks. Best reghards, Michael.