From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12535: 24.2.50; [PATCH] `edmacro-parse-keys' is incorrect for M- Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:00:51 -0400 Message-ID: <8736ji3vgs.fsf@gmail.com> References: <584510D2C7DE47CBAE19B5058B21B51C@us.oracle.com> <87eh3ba7s9.fsf@building.gnus.org> <877fhuej87.fsf@gnus.org> <87bn4t7ih6.fsf@gnus.org> <2493efa4-e079-446c-8926-f7ee14c04ec9@default> <87eg9oa7kp.fsf@gnus.org> <6b5e4737-edb3-4f0c-b4e7-252330d3436e@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="28654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 12535@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 07 14:13:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hk637-0007GJ-Kg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 14:13:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5rs-00037l-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5qq-0002iB-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5qp-0002DW-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5qn-0002Ca-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5qn-0002Ln-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:01:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 12:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12535 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 12535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12535.15625008609020 (code B ref 12535); Sun, 07 Jul 2019 12:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2019 12:01:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56226 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5ql-0002LQ-Pk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com ([209.85.166.46]:36254) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk5qk-0002LD-Ff for 12535@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 08:00:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o9so13078409iom.3 for <12535@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 05:00:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=B0V71oUgKLmCZF5PQ1OWWrAFSYY0tMSpivcJ6qQznrM=; b=mEJ08uBFXgOIfK37ZpKKwlgRffyXrBeq+z4fRfXcrQGRfIVDze2rigzQJLu2VCLlTQ sER94qo4g/9FP2hs9yhv9KHSLZOXKUZpxCUVOTss6Kug1TZEB82s4n99WY7hU1jDhSTg pDc/kQDIdctIHOCaszLNtR5asUGit/yK27sUWCVv/5b33bSO9G4Bpaw5zwBZxN7EwLEd +UASkRvIC6xjK7ohyg4Ll/XAFkq9PZ0pDWX+AbIOWOqHu8Sp8RrZ7T1eFJig+lN0OX/3 /z9Gx6osbKr+NFqO2hZwnrJzERkkV9rJXlX8aaGOro7sGtNrRdRMLjaAbthrDTMSbSdP uiqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=B0V71oUgKLmCZF5PQ1OWWrAFSYY0tMSpivcJ6qQznrM=; b=gjeiOHeqDO832jbFjPDO2w+BT5OoHUhqa9bY1YgcaFCbnQyeabTL+sKt3cydQURUNY 4ebOsLHQV41DGAFePG7K+KH9CqB8IwFtkir7sHxpYcVbE/n6yCgHzgHSLhKv7aHRhhbG TCdScMrkHwCcy/LlAtqAPXGysIAJT7kR/YwAfkB3Tj+dCNUipiE501IF/8JAKU4N/WuW 6BUdSzthSIC7PXUDgpkAQk2rhFznxjFfrio0QMdK+Y71yRh9BlQjpiqp4OiNcR00UcEZ QJTLkdLLjbIZZMn7M4b7EpHmMqTUhaGf1w+xtq5B/y9GPY0VPuEY8geNu7STOMaM3ZgD i59Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkihatrq83uYOwRwJ/BATR/IlmEYDo9JB6PorkpB5yLVluNQe3 8MsBgSxgyV8qQyp1S8RigN3Dc7Kh X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5yl+1TMM2A/f0LsyNfcz7lc8Y91Qu2JA0Qc41a0Dq62zW14a0KT4zUXcEPabGNY7osR5nQg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9703:: with SMTP id h3mr12923094iol.152.1562500852596; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 05:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm18637038ioj.47.2019.07.07.05.00.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Jul 2019 05:00:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6b5e4737-edb3-4f0c-b4e7-252330d3436e@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:21:51 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162275 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > I really cannot imagine why that 6-char fix would > not have been applied sometime in the 7 years that > have elapsed since the report - let alone why the > bug would now be closed as "wontfix". I think the reason is that when you say things like this: > Can you submit a new patch, preferably tested? Sorry; I really don't have the time now. But I think that all of the relevant info has been provided, so you should be able to DTRT. You unavoidably send the message that your time is more important than the person handling your bug report (to be clear, it's not the "I'm busy right now" part alone, but the combination of "I'm busy, you do it" that's the problem). > Just the bug report, regardless of whether any freebie suggested > solution code was also provided (which it was) [...] Similarly, use of the word "freebie" implies that you don't consider the time spent reading and checking posted patches for mistakes as important. If bug reports were answered by utility-maximising robots this wouldn't matter. However, we have only squishy humans available for bug report handling. Therefore, please try to think about the human on the receiving end before you post something.