From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:32:29 +0200 Message-ID: <8736gfqwgi.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8736gn59oe.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="100877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 29 11:33:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZy-000Q5Z-PU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:33:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZx-0003Y5-Dp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZg-0003UR-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZe-0000Rm-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZe-0000QQ-OS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZe-00051u-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.156974955519302 (code B ref 10842); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 09:32:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52245 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZD-00051G-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZB-000518-QH for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZ8-00073C-2W; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:32:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:29 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167632 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > I don't know how to explain it any better than in the OP. > The intent of the Rmail code is that discarding a draft should delete > the frame. It works with mail mode but not message mode. Message has two ways of returning to the caller (while not sending anything). message-dont-send runs RETURN-ACTION (which is presumably what Rmail uses to close the frame etc), while message-kill-buffer does not run RETURN-ACTION. I don't see how to reconcile that on the Message side. Rmail could set message-kill-actions to whatever it wants, which is why I think this is an Rmail bug. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no