From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36903: 27.0.50; gnus registry vs. debbugs Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:36:46 +0200 Message-ID: <8736gb8gtd.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87pnlmen9q.fsf@web.de> <87r261pwi6.fsf@web.de> <87tvaxvfxc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pnllvera.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfw497re.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87blx0afpv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r25rz36l.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87o90u2yq9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874l1e7wcq.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9tuh08w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h85dycnh.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgoxf86i.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87muf4tlve.fsf@gnus.org> <87ef0feuke.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h858nq1v.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87impmnisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87tv95bakx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r249jg44.fsf@web.de> <87a7asu33t.fsf@web.de> <871rw4mj82.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h84snj0w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="205662"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 36903@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 02 14:38:37 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdts-000rMu-J5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54970 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdtr-0008Vp-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:38:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdtK-0008T0-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdtK-0007f6-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdtJ-0007el-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdtJ-0002FZ-Kc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 12:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36903 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36903-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36903.15700198278586 (code B ref 36903); Wed, 02 Oct 2019 12:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36903) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2019 12:37:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdsR-0002EP-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFdsO-0002Du-MZ for 36903@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:37:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1570019808; bh=vDHHKJSXa6OKEQqSMqGCRzo1wZ7VSir1JWbT+aCOFTw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ev1QzOqNTEtdBddiJITaLXY/ztmlfvI4+yFDGNBuvEHcLspZrPuGjdXSRjKaHKi7J fusE/OQBKbkA706XTFTmKEpJh5iiqQaXFGLi6BLvZcZRS9aO3zMCCxXnlpV5G+a9r3 rdhqd5+Cus7oX2jjfJlwSLsaCIhM3PgzzzcaeCHY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.50.177]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N4zAs-1i5iBo1noC-010s6i; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:36:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h84snj0w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:27:43 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JDB5bWiguRJErUAZ1aoH3QECrEWmNAtoiBk6m7TisdRzBkjrfaR 4ruw/XQ24yLOONCAfNphRVEdO2DO328KpHCHPtOTlYIlXS67t3cG3v0o0iJGj7Pm9u1a+V1 a2FsLZWCRCDw1ZzGRW6wigvX1En/ZwzZCp3Ij2l84PU9bLFG4DDr5sLiZflRjlYVJwzajFk ERt4BRdSJzZk+r7BQfpbQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V6EQTIuImks=:sOBxV+I6q6gttlY8Y63Kp2 RV18yJUDX6uJSUjx57ra/80mgVhRY/jjwGhCsnIfEWnOIYGlk7Cg+3Q4BOuYSACKtk4lapux8 NPgImJ17f/SKkcsDmWhIgRPkXt9Hi/zehvr3SIR3vh0rJafJ083Ujx6ru0vNvzSAbRaY1KfJ0 XVEdcMM5+H1oNiek77k9ztj783E1qhxtj1r6+T8ch4o30r8Q5tmJKKXw+larpIJXO0Wct82Zj UIjfSJpMJ2Vy7jTUSBvZsWGoePmONU1doUNLmB15mmaDnsoScdy5g4kU7eot4Tn2yezW4oLgF VHLEh53Zd4xmGlysrMJrJUcr00DQVBHV/ClL8oAk4KKQ6bPSzgygahkPUNMyTaLT78OPHaQgD Jek6zlCk9I3Ov40Obs+M7QThWZFF76nwGfYIWhn9HtRdTm3AzhiBX5jvJuxqN0BLsHORpX0Jw OLF1K/ohPsZ6llfX3ZE5AlrTZrszRrMYvDEI+fsy66ZscuD0UoJ8ZI7HQB/daPiapp7qvsngG MQq1wFgWgO8uNFeHsNXBpi9Hg7iDUfDcUOV5npbMb86kthQu8VMJqWBS2bKpieR/YVBJDGr85 oLs5lQE9nH20+2LDyW3q69pc19owq+wj/Eue5yNNZ6uPEseWjU1u2Nl/IG+R7+94IRbujZ3MA vLTjhfx6aw7px7JUu2Afo1yHGwAbFQLQsPLoQ4hcOiPncRFVd+tjCSDLwfrhQ+8+42sECfhce B2fhamUPmPd9ScVpsYQVEm2M86/xxm2MiaiETX74VGwQs6SNmRfbAEg1+X5yYLWBdL130fNu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168143 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > Just pushed a commit that does this. The nice thing is, the unload-hook > sets gnus-registry-enabled to nil, which is a better (less > implementation-specific) test for whether we can rely on the registry > being present or not. Thanks. FTR, your patch still doesn't fix my problem as reported earlier. Best regards, Michael.