From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24560: 25.1; With `--font 7x13', wrong font is used for Unicode characters Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <8736em5qrh.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zims7zlk.fsf@home.thecybershadow.net> <87o8xbc6j2.fsf@gnus.org> <83h8325vql.fsf@gnu.org> <875zji79lh.fsf@gnus.org> <83eey65t4v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="165825"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24560@debbugs.gnu.org, thecybershadow@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 17 19:00:02 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOq9-000gxP-NZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:00:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOq7-0004ZC-W7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpE-0003sV-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpC-0004Ra-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpC-0004RQ-NQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpC-0003hR-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 24560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24560.157401352014193 (code B ref 24560); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 17:58:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOoq-0003gr-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOom-0003gb-Ng for 24560@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:58:38 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOod-0000VO-K1; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:58:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83eey65t4v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:07:12 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171829 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Sounds like a bug in the autoconfig stuff. > > Yes. The logic is a bit confused. if test "x${with_xft}" != "xno"; then EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([XFT], [xft >= 0.13.0], [], [HAVE_XFT=no]) [...] if test "$HAVE_XFT" != "yes"; then dnl For the "Does Emacs use" message at the end. HAVE_XFT=no HAVE_FREETYPE=no else dnl Strict linkers fail with dnl ftfont.o: undefined reference to symbol 'FT_New_Face' dnl if -lfreetype is not specified. dnl The following is needed to set FREETYPE_LIBS. EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([FREETYPE], [freetype2]) test "$HAVE_FREETYPE" = "no" && AC_MSG_ERROR(libxft requires libfreetype) fi fi # $HAVE_CAIRO != yes So if somebody says explicitly --without-xft, then HAVE_XFT won't be "yes", and we set HAVE_FREETYPE to "no" without checking. And harfbuzz depends on HAVE_FREETYPE being "yes", so harfbuzz depends on xft being available, too. Is this correct behaviour? In addition, I think the configure script should fail if you say --with-harfbuzz and harfbuzz isn't available. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no