From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40704: 28.0.50; Improve and speed up (Gnus) registry saving Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: <87368vapxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87a738ql1z.fsf@web.de> <87pnc2lrpi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfmpkac0.fsf@web.de> <87o8rl33oi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o8rjvvf5.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="92065"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40704@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 04:37:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRji-000Nr2-QS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60946 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRjh-0004o4-RT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRja-0004mU-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRja-0005YT-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRjZ-0005Xb-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRjZ-0008Mr-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 02:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40704 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40704-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40704.158760939832137 (code B ref 40704); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 02:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40704) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2020 02:36:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRjB-0008MF-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:47626 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRRj8-0008M0-9m for 40704@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (c-73-254-86-141.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.254.86.141]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91391FA099; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 02:36:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87o8rjvvf5.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:32:30 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178842 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> > -- who has experience with this problem -- anybody? > > Maybe the scaling idea is not a good idea at all. Even when it works as > we hope - the ideal factor could still depend on what kind of data is > saved. > >> Not me, let's hope for more respondents... > > Did you try how the increased gc-limit behaves for you btw? Then we > would at least have two data points. I applied the patch a couple of days ago and have been very pleased with the speedup! Nothing "bad" has happened, but I haven't tried experimenting with different gc limits, either.