From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40704: 28.0.50; Improve and speed up (Gnus) registry saving Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:11:03 -0700 Message-ID: <87368me0h4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87a738ql1z.fsf@web.de> <87pnc2lrpi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfmpkac0.fsf@web.de> <87o8rl33oi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o8rjvvf5.fsf@web.de> <87368vapxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="92708"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40704@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 18:15:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpNC-000O0F-5e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:15:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpNA-0003Cd-Q0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpKt-0002pq-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpJa-00065y-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpJa-00065s-FG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpJa-00049s-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40704 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40704-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40704.158817669015937 (code B ref 40704); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40704) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2020 16:11:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpJ4-00048z-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:52232 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTpJ2-00048f-14 for 40704@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (c-73-254-86-141.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.254.86.141]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11F6BFA16B; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:11:20 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87368vapxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:36:25 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179329 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Michael Heerdegen writes: > >> Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> >>> > -- who has experience with this problem -- anybody? >> >> Maybe the scaling idea is not a good idea at all. Even when it works as >> we hope - the ideal factor could still depend on what kind of data is >> saved. >> >>> Not me, let's hope for more respondents... >> >> Did you try how the increased gc-limit behaves for you btw? Then we >> would at least have two data points. > > I applied the patch a couple of days ago and have been very pleased with > the speedup! Nothing "bad" has happened, but I haven't tried > experimenting with different gc limits, either. Hey let's at least stick in the modification-hook and hash-table improvements now, there are Gnus users out there still waiting for their registry to save! It helps noticeably with EBDB, too.