From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45617: loses the edit region. Works in 23.3, broke in 26.3 Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 20:46:05 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <8735zcpouq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <000001d6e16c$984bcb70$c8e36250$@net> <83turycc18.fsf@gnu.org> <87ble4ob6v.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <000601d6e2ea$8f6601e0$ae3205a0$@net> <877dorkznt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <002701d6e39b$4ac35680$e04a0380$@net> <8735ze9e09.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83mtxm0vzd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20353"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: bobfloyd@comcast.net, 45617@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 19:49:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaLO-0005A9-RY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56502 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaLN-0002SC-T2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaLF-0002PV-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaLF-0004bj-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaLF-0007bE-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 18:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45617 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45617-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45617.161004530129142 (code B ref 45617); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 18:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45617) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2021 18:48:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48687 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaKb-0007Zx-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:41339) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxaKZ-0007ZX-N1 for 45617@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:48:20 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.98.64 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-98-64.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.98.64]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F6851BF206; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:48:11 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83mtxm0vzd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 06 Jan 2021 20:19:02 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197501 Archived-At: >> The question we need to answer: should this fix affect all other uses >> of the minibuffer? So for any command that operates on the active region >> and asks its arguments from the minibuffer, when you copy the text >> from the original buffer to the minibuffer and thus change its region, >> should quitting the minibuffer restore the original region for >> all such commands? This means restoring the original mark and point. > > I think the answer is YES, especially if we did behave like that in > the distant past. Interesting, this means this behavior was changed intentionally in a recent version?