From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:52:07 +0100 Message-ID: <8735uzvgo8.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13744"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 20:53:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7a-0003R0-Oo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 20:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7Z-0003ih-Qi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7S-0003iV-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7O-0003As-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7O-0006gh-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 18:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48179.162032713825685 (code B ref 48179); Thu, 06 May 2021 18:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 18:52:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej6g-0006gD-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:36504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej6e-0006g4-0B for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id l24-20020a7bc4580000b029014ac3b80020so5847949wmi.1 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=oly+WpsUTHBARKeHyyva7NpSj+4bTQ9q/49yhoYtpHY=; b=eKkgfXeoYpetvtoS9mEIyI9lVAHc3PzV9VHiVewOgICejDRr7fKGl9/zK0Q8pMUAis 1LpRNrawo8K9S5xhEZS8Ncq5TZue2Q+u/Ok57CME5H2/LGSM810f05es1FU7q6ZTVTd0 ceimszoUsSdkNjI8LpX0GJRSaLKLRP37sgNSMLdfVBKh7gGBwjXZydm5jxCgFzXlsVI1 oPeD246ExTDY1gYXh80T0IMjhfVo55CPgYZGFKqLoN3eK4xEN0f+avqb3xGW2e0lT4ym zq4jST14t2MZFTpvfzlOZamYGNgr6MER8CmFLND2C/0dKfIDX/OS763mY2HoJEiGRMXn s6Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=oly+WpsUTHBARKeHyyva7NpSj+4bTQ9q/49yhoYtpHY=; b=nqZENGe8jIDPbxW4hyCt4BHAe/YhjAdsvaOWwm5mySHmsjDvsEgshUM5ZZZ1iEibgO UAoXPew1BdLTJFJ8Kv0EfKqUMvsJz5fCoiRjeNNwd6Pfp1O3+TwEHtQGXkoaVEPq98+/ XV+C/COFDroZme7TB9XkMw+1yrNey3qX18nO59GzmYYubzKx8PGKZk59NrX/FvFV0PW+ 8+cfgbO1iqqtbhticzXUcdsNHmInXeaJuLVjDwfl/PHaMZuRUReCVUUVx972CfrVQNQF j5v3e1fYkEjQJcr/uf/SwJK9cfECvs4sh4pCWzqPCqLURpHx3opYIApTsaSXv5kW7DyJ WLgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xf6ZeEzuLau1Obv+Yewos6NpBaXc2yJNxuUXHBj8Sd2729Hfj k+2obiPa3NiBGFT+GdpGXXKvBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWjgTNtb7E397yRsFJenwCTPa5P27kC69O0zoLK/xVONtcunN7rv7o26RSxwdd/paFGL2pPw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:251:: with SMTP id 17mr17075453wmj.64.1620327130111; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm4515119wmh.37.2021.05.06.11.52.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 12:30:38 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205871 Archived-At: Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-05 13:26, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: >> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: >> > >> >> If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay >> >> remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay >> >> be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? >> > >> > You mean when giving the bookmark the same name? >> >> Yes, sorry, I meant multiple 'C-x r m RET' in the same buffer. >> >> > (You can have several bookmarks in the same file with different >> > names.) >> > >> > Yes, that would make sense. > > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting I wouldn't worry, since I only set out to fix a couple of typos - I don't intend to work on bookmark.el any time soon. > That should go some way to account for your catch and some other > scenarios. There may be others that crop up. Thanks, any chance of a patch? ;) -- Basil