From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: <8735tkft93.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87pn5oq1hj.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <831ri34i0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8l7zdh6.fsf@rub.de> <83o8l731yd.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qzzae2.fsf@rub.de> <83lfgb2yss.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01nz7gb.fsf@rub.de> <83blh72vlk.fsf@gnu.org> <878scbyw3s.fsf@rub.de> <87sgai76oj.fsf@gmx.net> <878s3e3qgf.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46312@debbugs.gnu.org, 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 15:53:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1m-0007nD-7Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:53:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1l-0006XR-6s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1S-0006Vf-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1S-0004XR-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1S-0000Zy-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46312 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 46312-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46312.16236787742183 (code B ref 46312); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:52:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1K-0000Z7-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:52:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:37863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1J-0000Ym-3J; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:52:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1623678762; bh=J4RLMIqBxlAY/6GWtLhmP0okFmpopI+YxabPP3wjqLk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iWXIQWXcmcEDSFmXQdMwuo9dQ0Q/DHvYyH0QayrNjJTK6clYBr1HNN4B2T/Yogl8p Yxj4QoqpQtVCs4i68193b2G8RF2W4LKMel7IjCsxIcvkbABDzsB0Mpf12Qa7a2LMhq rWmUybT1YXZCe2KqMoKi2pA9eAMmu/L+Uujqrx6E= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobelfs ([94.220.126.243]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M1ps8-1luysE2VEu-002EFl; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:52:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ie/ukzIltoe1fjbA9rObJPxga2oCZxe0DUW9l7E8PilfBFM2wN6 dC/2g2pW9JHH7053QyEZkOqFcWVvDqcWMZcFkzEgqZ/1pUVagyw3ORQViNFf6rs8oA0HhNu m7OjzKR27LXM0h2I+M7kgPQFOyC/QiFM3VEz3a6r8R+QWOujHkArrrat4Kq1uqYpkXSqHOG jUk8Y1VN7ojCxXuMX0FlA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xkoMIyWV3AY=:uh5X8c2J8bbnw/W7rAAlCl EL6wI8Dj5mbQKQc8d3xvefgyUXjoW/lB6xVKHchdPC/xi07BVT4BrlFxYfd6uTn1Spu/zag4T qF21mQyC0L25yQR3OVjHdApu1otcSKHspYMTyRbtBt9uYRAn7HGN+MF4t0+VPJ0GaTFj5xFJH Qmxqgfxf47WX9J7IHhVANXnmciLTBiaNwzG7teO/joQlw8/ry7BLplVUnRorOJ7qAAGYDr5u+ 2F3gs+PzIrAVsFLgbBYeIeYXfsxktCjDR3JM0za/FrplQvZphKj2mXtk+i1iYpNIFeDrqz8De 8iwJ6EuLcZxSaeYQp68KMHGujP0heg23MfyplfiDBTuhmSE37xfEaxi1xAwjeCg24Z6VRlmYr H6X0b62KdkwDdkTHRBNFtWn111HIrDJoM4WsUMRcLedt8VpwSK5ApakZLygPNl9ZdA6IpG+oj dmDC74WzMhIWX6DrKgIRW/YTWr6RPHukTEJyuLYylzLr/4r4ppCewS/jrXtZBE0OQrxYPvRgZ vozLNhhZINkOkjG8aCJ+2eb29Us+9EDS5027q70Y5FopIh4gjDENpDpljTq7Tcx4Z0kTdC/vB kJmn2jUkXZGMcIOnrRSiugpMHOVOFZhJiE3+c828RZGpdqag+Dkn3juK+2dYYqj5mWOhQdYEc ZpIq1WLZchAmfmWR8tAaltipFE3erebtfx851kD6Xu8ro2SQKUclKYoZtDgFZO1roskXCLMIK DwhGxIyZGPvPDbK5Gi6tVsyOdOUKYJzc1T+NVUCuZDzjqn+y9Ll70BIsLHsqIaykAl8KBzRK X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208491 Archived-At: On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> Upthread Eli said "some SGML/HTML expert should say if that is TRT". >> I'm no such expert so I can't make that decision. > > I'm not either, but at this point I'd rather apply the patch and then we > can see whether some SGML expert pipes up... Sounds good. >> Here's the test, in case someone else wants to see if >> they can figure it out; I haven't succeeded: > > Just needs a `font-lock-ensure' after `html-mode'. :-) Then the test > fails without your patch, and passes with your patch. Ah, thanks. The ways of font lock are unfathomable to me. > So I went ahead and pushed your patch (and the test) to Emacs 28 (with > some minor changes to the test). Thanks. I noticed, unfortunately only just now, that the ert test includes the unused let-bound variable `results' which I inadvertantly left behind from the previous version, and which will probably make the byte-compiler complain. Steve Berman