From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46908: 28.0.50; Dozens of spurious markers in buffer-undo-list Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 02:04:30 +0200 Message-ID: <8735g0ryi9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87o8fzn9fa.fsf@web.de> <0ca78c1b-7737-8a87-9edc-deaa551677fa@gmx.at> <87wnumswhr.fsf@web.de> <6ccba248-7643-280a-4560-88872fb08457@gmx.at> <87sg5asr6k.fsf@web.de> <7b04f87b-8d7a-e151-5b4a-d77bd6ea1506@gmx.at> <87y2f1m7ez.fsf@web.de> <87mtve2t2q.fsf@web.de> <5e12eae1-94fd-d2c7-923d-f4dbabf3da52@gmx.at> <87k0qh9j6p.fsf@web.de> <87czw99ifl.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24911"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46908@debbugs.gnu.org, martin rudalics , Yuan Fu To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 02:06:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o34vu-0006KP-P3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 02:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o34vs-0000Qt-Vv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o34ug-0008O3-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o34uc-0006Uq-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o34uc-0006JB-Cw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46908 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46908-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46908.165568348124206 (code B ref 46908); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46908) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2022 00:04:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o34uH-0006IM-Hy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55744) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o34uF-0006I4-RL for 46908@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:04:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+rwja9jrHjbRq4nax6H3SHN4/4/mnX4aYdOUvM9S4sU=; b=SXDUHk+hqamQjlbn/UFUOxv+Mm sh6cef23MdK7DqwP2x9eAG2rrpfWlCHGSkDQXYtkSgTYMUNRnrjmx84s0N61UOWhKG8JCcTyp9F5p B8A/1F3JW8i5XlhOxHXz4WG8dgymitDxpF7qRrC8W/7+bZbStCaYlK2sHoA6jqCPZwKw=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o34u7-0003o3-Fb; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 02:04:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czw99ifl.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2021 03:20:30 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234828 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > I did some more experimentation (repeated copy, paste, undo and > garbage-collect in *scratch*), and I saw that the number of markers > living in buffer-undo-list is not monotonously increasing. After some > time, the amount settles between 20 and 45 or so. And stays in that > range. Giving that a large, but still limited number of copies of the > mark marker is stored in the mark rings, that amount of markers isn't a > surprise, and if the number is not constantly growing, > everything...works as expected so far I think. Correct? I just lightly skimmed this thread, but does this mean that there's nothing to fix here? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no