From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63722: 29.0.91; (elisp) Skip to end #@00 does not work Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 11:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87353jl8lf.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83y1lcl08j.fsf@gnu.org> <2ABCFF9F-1487-4EF0-AF4D-ADA567ACA344@acm.org> <87ilcffmx0.fsf@gmx.de> <16AA20F2-358C-48BF-A750-0D52A0DAF0EB@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10695"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: richardn26@gmail.com, 63722@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 26 11:57:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UCK-0002cv-HI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UC1-0006ui-4T; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UBy-0006uY-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UBy-0002gq-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UBx-0004tV-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63722 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63722-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63722.168509498618682 (code B ref 63722); Fri, 26 May 2023 09:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63722) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2023 09:56:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UBN-0004rF-JY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:38999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2UBL-0004qO-Ea for 63722@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:56:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1685094973; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=10X9sHg+KTnNm+m8s7Hy0zx6kwWlInhW6V61NzZz+Tk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IT4EQtWpRl8OVMeKidq4+lso4agZk/FPj+SCMla5sfE715CbcZL0n9vO+bSoQtgXx NZ3NRMMDRr8Z4ztItd6EBkkS/+u4y8UMHYoOLIsSKU0aBni+SXA4Xi67SYV0iyrXat 8Ja1/PT4XOjZhGWRN+1Ie/hwYDbNNiExevQKHc7YmV+9WvKTvUzNn4uxTv9RHq/IQu CAIc6zY3AnN1kbs0nXAmHRp5jVQhql8IvesJTUZl+TU5vIc1fSFJkKMMgm0MYtjCmD LgmCiWDMFzLAUTluO95Yx/6eVEnFUIPkmb/HDNhSGH9QHblsIvHLzkuZX3kLaHTSo5 3/kDPnZFSpbPw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.13]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MmULr-1qT3ca2D21-00iWER; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:56:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <16AA20F2-358C-48BF-A750-0D52A0DAF0EB@acm.org> ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Fri, 26 May 2023 11:51:43 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:O7kZ5MkiLZy/4PgS9RcKbKxBH9H1IkqIC8IYXlBMGAMTXF8/EaW T5wtpfhucv9OVw0gg3pYiRoHGw/q8FF2TkM/NYMvtuG8mg474e2q29geQnUS+NkF5r4yLsR HzpfuCkmSj+w5stjfoTo6NUuU7ObZ0b2C/sP5A8yz7yuWWPyqCG/X9JnuOoUMUxqtqQWBK/ 9cSnWUwOmZR7hmONnAFpQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:vDJ3Kcigzuc=;R3Q7qq3Eya2KUaevrxmJ9EfLJ5L AreAG8ihBuqNKgKFhYgrwqqn+C+5spjKDZIEM2amMoTu6XXHNy0jrZxO19Spw81iC1DW4FQSN VmHXkQ43oqOc/vcWayY7WsZftaV1EMhKjgiCh+rCED0juuUDO0C8IyILKmm3r/6DbXl7D76dN z6i8Ng5U2ClV/76stTHfUu03jEvM5FOorBK8bzsdj9c9IhCXTbifJt3rhyNQsvZ72LRHuDyQj wBWVPgnoJu+7UveQP6rpq60enaPit7bJaYXmmgWANJBd3lC77nv5ntqdD/nxNpOYwR7aTMclu 7rq+jWrfSkSnYggKyuvsbnlwnOBM5J3lgnBId45R++kGdoyXjN16A6FqeCH7Tze6JSSpruJmj WR1qENlAxbVTur/59YkK/Zkbx0vJ04dkbH4aZOrHJuQtojrTkftgHojI7EPfMjCZDLlYwoyPA SFCnmM4yAYf0Qb76tJ1BU2zDp3fTvODSuVq1IeS2uxxgNpsO2ZzB1sQNly5F7wCo85R5kHlAW 6ITeR98TgkEKyqlraLNWxK3ruKW5G1D/PlVOyEESgv859rWqt35oT0ehfOKyxZWWUuT+gB5tq F8eA9QHLu88wuMGImV8/edAq3OMJqzVRkoPq/4m5EHoc1UqO7k/2mJTvCTTkAQjIK0GeEtPpM KClTuiv/ZnmP55IEBm/0l8iVKtUJfR3PuS7SAjSwbkGpHh4LQ/rNTlFG1mSU9CqoT+LCaQs3j jaX9G6VPB3lGf/v+MrslTjFOXZddLHWt85rTCEHIayO0MNOz0YopSb4rdcYyCTuI/uz49XbM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262422 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd writes: Hi Mattias, >>> The undocumented #@00 behaviour has indeed been co-opted by parts of >>> the community as an 'pretend end-of-file occurs here' mechanism, >>=20 >> Should this be documented then? > > I don't think we should do that right now -- the behaviour (read as > nil) is not ideal and should not be made permanent; we still have the > option to change it (but not in emacs 29, of course). > > We could also come up with a less obscure replacement syntax, given > that there may be a genuine need. Everything right. But it is used meanwhile in the wild ... perhaps we should document then, that this usage is deprecated? Best regards, Michael.