From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7470: 24.0.50; Word Isearch lazy highlighting Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:16:21 -0500 Message-ID: <871v5xj9y2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87r5eb4hta.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291513535 18012 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2010 01:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7470@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 05 02:45:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3fM-00052W-Gy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:45:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3fM-0006a3-1U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40955 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3fE-0006Z4-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3fD-0001Ip-2G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3fC-0001Ij-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP381-0006f6-UI; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7470 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7470-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7470.129151143525562 (code B ref 7470); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7470) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2010 01:10:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP37b-0006eE-7T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP37Z-0006e2-LO for 7470@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014248.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB51GL4d029457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 398FA16059F; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:16:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:49:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:11:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42169 Archived-At: Dani Moncayo writes: > I understand and agree with your reasoning, and I think would be good > to include that idea in the section of the manual that I quoted > before. The way it is worded now seems a bit misleading/incomplete to > me. I've changed the manual text to reflect this. Thanks.