From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:42:29 +0900 Message-ID: <871v5id2my.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: <8739q54g7x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762uxob2f.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hfb14o9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762uud74t.fsf@broken.deisui.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292457219 1882 80.91.229.12 (15 Dec 2010 23:53:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 16 00:53:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT1A5-00052S-S1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:53:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PT1A5-0008NB-FO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:53:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46788 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PT19Z-00087x-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT19G-0007hi-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT19G-0007hP-U5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0u6-0004Ho-BB; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daiki Ueno Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7487 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129245620316448 (code B ref -1); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2010 23:36:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0tm-0004HF-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0tk-0004H3-HR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0zp-0005WC-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:48864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0zo-0005Vz-UE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:42:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PT0zn-0005y7-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:42:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0zl-0005Ua-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:42:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp ([219.117.176.192]:50612) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT0zk-0005Tz-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from ([192.168.0.187]) (envelope sender: ) by ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp with Active!Hunter esmtp server; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:42:49 +0900 Original-Received: Received: from well-done.deisui.org (g187018.scn-net.ne.jp [202.83.187.18]) (authenticated) by blue17.scn-net.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id oBFNgmbL011976; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:42:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: <8762uud74t.fsf@broken.deisui.org> (Daiki Ueno's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:05:22 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:37:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42538 Archived-At: Daiki Ueno writes: > Personally I don't like this kind of multiple-candidate question in the > mini-buffer :-) Maybe we could reuse the prefix argument (as `C-u M-x > epa-sign-region') to control whether the key selection UI is shown, or > simplify the key selection dialog by hiding the public key list by > default, with say `visibility' widget. Hmm, I recalled that why we currently don't use the prefix argument there: epa-file-write-region() may be implicitly called from other interactive commands like save-buffer, write-file, etc. where the prefix argument has different meanings. So my current suggestion is: 1. add epa-file-encrypt-to hack to auth-source.el, and 2. extend epa-file-select-keys (not epa-file-encrypt-to) so that it can have 'ask or 'always or 'quiet, etc., and 3. simplify the key selection UI by hiding public key list where 1 may look unnecessary once 2 is done, but it would be better to do both 1 and 2, as long as Gnus supports older versions of Emacs. What do you think? Other ideas are welcome of course :-) Regards, -- Daiki Ueno