From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19950: 25.0.50; nnimap: don't split messages back into original group Followup-To: gmane.emacs.devel Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:10:23 +0000 Message-ID: <871tld2r7k.fsf__17055.786032188$1424927482$gmane$org@violet.siamics.net> References: <87ioepnx98.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424927482 5453 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2015 05:11:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:11:22 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, 19950@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 26 06:11:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj8-0006NB-TZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 06:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57379 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj8-0003iT-3P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj4-0003hD-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj1-00034b-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj1-00034U-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqj0-0006xO-48; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19950 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19950-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19950.142492743726712 (code B ref 19950); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19950) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2015 05:10:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqia-0006wj-2d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:46569) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqiX-0006wW-1C for 19950@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:10:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=6RhPEXzJ48QWYhsUg07WyHYPghqNEhPPHy9Lyy+8dR8=; b=NNR8It4t/QI+j9b+tItEKFyut5neXiO6nKgX5x+qK6NEKfflf04vB/Tol+WScrWuEQ1uKtB8PsnvApbC8TgB2pc4HoWIuq+uj9TZM/VY1xeIfq/ug1ERVqxOOO8MXJr68AUyEfNZJ9wOA4HLUfSWKca2kL0ythgfrVbKfUtPvac=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqiV-00019L-C7; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:10:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQqiO-0001s4-KY; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:10:24 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ioepnx98.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:54:11 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99830 Archived-At: >>>>> Eric Abrahamsen writes: [=E2=80=A6] > If this is acceptable, does it need a CHANGELOG mention? I've gotten > pretty confused about what's LOG-worthy, and what isn't. Apart of fixes applied to ChangeLog itself, pretty much every change has to be listed there. (This is contrary to, say, NEWS, which only documents =E2=80=9Cuser-visible=E2=80=9D changes.) > * lisp/nnimap.el (nnimap-split-incoming-mail): If a message is > already in the group it should be split to, don't re-copy it into the > group. [=E2=80=A6] --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A