From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22244: 25.0.50; Make eww use display-buffer to display eww buffer Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:29:12 +0100 Message-ID: <871ta9nmon.fsf@web.de> References: <87bn9dno9q.fsf@web.de> <8737upm9cd.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451151026 18433 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 17:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 18:30:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfV-0007uB-9x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfU-0006io-KI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfP-0006hf-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfK-0007yP-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:30:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfK-0007yD-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsfK-0003Hp-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145115098212569 (code B ref -1); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 17:29:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsew-0003Ga-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsev-0003GH-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsem-0007qJ-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:32973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsem-0007qF-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsei-0006dY-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsed-0007ot-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:60315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCsed-0007on-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.2.151]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McnqH-1ZvUMP10sr-00HzTi; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:29:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737upm9cd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:02:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+NK8PnLHh4uX9b6Yo/+1JWOrHfENUSkKI/rgmPEhOcIfbyVKyd2 b9nNEzHBePhYCke42jDU2rlgBX+LNV/PNXDr67REOHKBavCW1Qo7AUuEt1fvxjdU+shCGR0 LFpBzN8Ic54uGun6i/kYaYEioFQkEz5uEbmPBZs2bLHj5vaEGbDDlnEUNZwAqsawRhpypJr 31y9Fikn6JjAp+ddO3bOw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Ztg+fIJldjY=:2Sm1ATq9tGon3ii63PaCm4 03gTuzdVGnynRTSyHMiwqln2QqmAbFsxTc6Ek8ELnaWCUEh6QrgX0ay731fPq3Wjdi/EAvQKo GYXzCFdPbpxhjCfhiCvdizf/ISFkZuOKA//hJptHz85q/JQb17cP5et4HvbiUNS+RjgxbkvCP rKdQt0+Tu5KtGf8Ko9KuUUOaw1FxSks84dut5Gw8vHhUOU9tLtFBBgzd5ikYUggc+HlY+XB0A w44GuDeS9bfoZw4wS7LrEVKKN9I8T+wJn78mYZcjxZaaom4XaD22PF3b+IIMvJaujj6qMbDtO Fext2KKnJvoArvfCQ6OJvYF1gDiApgnb5oDp0WfpXG7VxzfWo7zeVVUnkengwKdbHfsDFD0Ha V/0gvQ4rSDnExGzSrbgOC4h9kAGsWKaXX/E5bnsr695V6mIdAHsrHrmCQPncY1fGBuAP3tFC0 QM/4PRg3LC82Wy9aE0bS4kmRuhA264ROK069FMPQD5ZPAtnu+BZ8Hk8PJ/qHuFkuyp9rAVlFI IRoPyYZIjmvFK/OjHzalLFSisqI3puUAfk0Uz4BntNtb6W8uXFcdt7wpf2ljNDAwRD1CfnqfF +8dhK3HWLol/EZ1vOf/s/Aufb8szJlQgf44YvRda1zp1GUJtRFRNi9S49y0h5V8VI59rcujCP dTuJkDuHtM3tsn/MPLhaZZBiYZWSacVjuvo81GFGe12X+bt1mWcTu6XADRUO70lsqS/t31Dg6 EcFfhr/STBMfVuzIHxBmTGdYr0r+9RuTRx08r2M0Si4EPlc0e94iahhc/YSOIAaHdqTzF3+P X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110708 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm not familiar with display-buffer, but by default it seems to work > like pop-to-buffer? I wouldn't say so. Today, pop-to-buffer is defined in terms of display-buffer (it calls it). The semantics of display-buffer are a bit complicated (it's documented in the manual, but you'll need some minutes to understand the concept) - but it is highly customizable via user options. display-buffer can be controlled on a finer level that in the old days (with variables like same-window-buffer-names etc.). AFAIK it's the standard way today to display a buffer. User preferences can be overridden/modified/refined at run-time when calling display-buffer via the optional args. The default behavior of display-buffer depends on the user options display-buffer-overriding-action display-buffer-base-action display-buffer-fallback-action With the default values, these functions are tried in order (that's the default value of `display-buffer-fallback-action'): (display-buffer--maybe-same-window display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer--maybe-pop-up-frame-or-window display-buffer-in-previous-window display-buffer-use-some-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame) So, in the unconfigured case, the buffer is just displayed in the selected window. Regards, Michael.