From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28597: 26.0.60; [Security] Configure should use --without-pop by default Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:14:06 +0200 Message-ID: <871smjl70h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <837ewh8x5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2upd2h5.fsf@gmail.com> <83a81d7666.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8vl1db2.fsf@gmail.com> <873771wm1y.fsf@gmail.com> <87vajwvej8.fsf@gmail.com> <0648ed49-af37-e64c-9b9b-33f290d35dca@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507101318 12261 195.159.176.226 (4 Oct 2017 07:15:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 07:15:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, 28597@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistbox2@gmail.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 04 09:15:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtc-0002Nh-LM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:15:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtk-0007rv-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtb-0007nG-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:15:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtW-0003Ln-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtW-0003Lg-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdtW-0001Xa-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 07:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28597 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28597.15071012565841 (code B ref 28597); Wed, 04 Oct 2017 07:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2017 07:14:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdsl-0001W9-SM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:44743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzdsk-0001Vt-9i for 28597@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 196so8383721wma.1 for <28597@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:14:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pbEosCXI2SiBt0FtORZcwB2qf67Rg8o9fd7bnbzIaLE=; b=Mz155Z+glCniVsi2APfHSHHjr+hSsKTzegkkBGtjOulMZ2R0KCJxgHpa/YKRvXO4VA 8Jy4RTpszTnF4PoebyQRjTWLyaEAJYntJLnT7ANRXmgME7bmNxam1aXpxpSsGlqgG97y /CdLWqHYX2LRMBeVEvC+Nt7EqU6uO+ehQxW2fTN3ON3uR/q/VQbvHpvbEQyZkFuh/xNw nyC935zraIiDS3Sa+uC+i8AnLkPfFy29gMX7INFPdqFtsgplzr+nkkr58Whv8RmpaHzj 4JSqPoZnea5fOchtpJZHOz9K17gDS5gsAx3jz0Bx8gPWZsG9MB8p2GO9KFgAk08390L0 D+0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=pbEosCXI2SiBt0FtORZcwB2qf67Rg8o9fd7bnbzIaLE=; b=bxWoBp+PZk+i1SE9/vLFbbH7R+yIPBI89h+uvp3GrQIRCsYfD9cmKBbAApxV8uYweG +f6ZuqWEmKt+LTpjW2wxuyV6SQrRv7KUhU3VYqn18OGSnPqvEDWodrRspohVHBvuZjbb HiZsrL8p7G1afBQQOdcEOJst82Rtx5MSwDpozKzlIm6UI9F2Ll12JFNsaiJI5FIarGED n5PvZlutF/A36gWRMFTol5lz+SD3czn54d6UjLv3+tChAD3KFSjwp4uuCsidqb/locsB dJwoggJKWeD5xL4e5s24tQT91HqgkoAns9cX2tiT0eO+JEHonDbHd/ZPNAnPAmR5nLwv 1F6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjWUx2+lqECaexfIx9CWONsF5ZgMu70WNNCkpWAAXwowPq0O/N1 Oqea6hvjErU1MGsA+Ci7rms= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDyzv+0Lnh8IULY/dJt+TI30Q1eBZs7q01p0+SbEDnRpf3QIj/6wR5MRWhiZff5JbKWA8k4GA== X-Received: by 10.80.178.36 with SMTP id o33mr27782417edd.116.1507101248357; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a99sm11891400edf.54.2017.10.04.00.14.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <0648ed49-af37-e64c-9b9b-33f290d35dca@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:47:15 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137871 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > On 10/03/2017 01:09 AM, Robert Pluim wrote: >> I think configure should output >> *something* to warn people about the change in behaviour. > > That's easy and harmless enough, so I installed the attached into > emacs-26, after installing the patch I previously mentioned in this > thread. I have some minor thoughts about the wording of the warning, but nothing worth another commit. Looks good to me. Robert