From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alex Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29150: Fwd: 26.0.90; Input decoding is sometimes skipped in TTY (xterm-mouse-mode) Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:26:44 -0600 Message-ID: <871sl8j7bv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y3nka4ez.fsf@t-online.de> <87wp34a2i1.fsf@t-online.de> <87a7zwjxo6.fsf@gmail.com> <8760akjw60.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510208834 27321 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 06:27:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 06:27:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Olaf Rogalsky , 29150@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 07:27:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIt-0006m0-By for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:27:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35328 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIy-0000CD-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIt-0000C4-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIn-0002hy-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIn-0002hs-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIn-0006bi-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29150.151020881825389 (code B ref 29150); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2017 06:26:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59334 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIj-0006bR-VS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:50699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCgIh-0006bD-Ru for 29150@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:26:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 72so9895350itl.5 for <29150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:26:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=AU962asW7u6FMJr7Y7Q5HZsYhWKXAtGW+fCOYy0Nlt8=; b=ufEzTThIpPz3aVcexsC6cX4+2JbwxdGoERNvgVgynVOYvrUV6ouhpkhuu2kh1vis6d p7cDhWUvjKO7dQfCSwmIsH/b225epHmNKz91EICdpU04FHrQ5FOzYJoot00/iM1kBIw2 cvcxwG9TjjJEiFhCdXm7sOU99PcjG/yH84hXitlHnAQCWmQtKlNMnvcwkV6Ex3hc1ecm xO0IMadAVAacOOtvkiJ/IdiNPgBdI1sV2Y8DGAcO9lLlzBSkDB8isorSaklnCslQ1bEi Kyt0WYuq3OMs2Ja6qSPdKWUAMXtO6Omeydjt32+g88dAKVSOHaMwzDwW/Yhz+T2yHbkB Utvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=AU962asW7u6FMJr7Y7Q5HZsYhWKXAtGW+fCOYy0Nlt8=; b=WSlbYn3IngHTt7JT2vD2iUSPOz5uLoOrv4+THAWAx8b49hW+AkceMszccQPPL0dzeA nggItpnijC7rWh71N/VBoULQuDzNR+NKE9Pe6gzUHjXNoaeejXtq5BqfYIpqDug/4CeY QkO4nVA2Zl7mK9xyU4Bv/Ffyw6JT7I5BzRAm3q4oLZbcNuB7tArjh8o4nDSGNUGW+uj3 pm9+ue/fkEJC3ua5U2kDSRz3Pf1dgJC8YUGQtb92L0hbOjzo+2rADrKMsi/MSh3aPM+A uPAcWMhCOH6SvvKREvEQ/onj2WUiElzbD5wStfiFa1b2s+/ssUP3QbtmIKuV9O7Qk9yw co6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5/WWV3+SJvjCmZ08/ny6NKGPkuaEx5w3psNF80MZ1YpGSTJu8N sSF0rr5+i0NGUIltSerE6mgqYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SA8jLvZp+GFvSmCBcZSiK+GEN51f4aFvLS0jC7T0s4mRs1EQvchslDErmmIB2lvgp1y37I8Q== X-Received: by 10.36.123.149 with SMTP id q143mr3864792itc.122.1510208810010; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:26:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from lylat (S010664777d9cebe3.ss.shawcable.net. [70.64.85.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x137sm3306597itb.37.2017.11.08.22.26.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:26:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:13:32 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139653 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I'm not sure why, or what it would say. `read-key` is a reasonably good > replacement for `read-event`, but it's still pretty brittle. > The better solution is to not "read" anything and let the main loop do > it for you (which is why I changed mouse-drag-track to use > set-transient-map instead of mucking with `read-event` or `read-key`). Assuming that no one ports evil-mode's code or updates the code in `mouse-drag-secondary' (there's already a FIXME for this there), is using `read-key' inside of `track-mouse' an acceptable stopgap solution? Is it brittle enough to not apply the change to emacs-26? > In my experience, most uses of `read-event` are (latent) bugs, so maybe > it's in read-event's docstring that we should say something. That sounds like a good idea.